Profile of Cardboard Tank

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 978

General Information


Thread: OH Sniper1 Apr 2015, 20:12 PM German sniper has to fight more entities in a squad which usually are cheaper to reinforce too. In: Lobby
Thread: Is the King Tiger still worth 260 fuel?1 Apr 2015, 17:26 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Apr 2015, 17:21 PMThe_rEd_bEar nothing axis fanboys just think the kt should be invincible Instantly claiming fanboyism on someone with another opinion. Get out of the thread if you dont want to discuss properly. The point is that for multiple cost you invest all your fuel into one unit that now has the armor of an IS-2. Which with call in meta and no tech is way easier to get. God forbid a German tank gets frontal armor and you got to flank. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the King Tiger still worth 260 fuel?1 Apr 2015, 16:54 PM Hey, I tried to make some games with the KT, but it´s hard to get. In fact it has always been hard to get. Costing officially 260 fuel - but practically 390 fuel (2/3 income) + all three tech buildings up, it doesn´t seem worth to get. But it now has the same frontal-armor value as an IS-2. Not even the stronger gun can justify this. At the end of the day, with all the tech involved, the lowered fuel income and the high price, it costs as much as two IS-2s. And it does get the same armor. I think it´s dull to do this as historically (omg did he say history) it had more armor. If it has to be tuned down, because Allied players are too lazy to flank - I think at least a price decrease would be adequate. You barely see it. tl;dr - Problem: Same armor as IS-2, yet almost twice as expensive fuel-wise for the first unit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should Relic apologise for dishonoring Soviets in COH2?30 Mar 2015, 23:07 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 23:00 PMboc120 Bad poll options. I won't vote, but I don't think any apology is needed. What? It´s great Russian-style poll. Do you agree? [x] Yes or [ ] Yes Next president? [x] Putin or ~~[ ]Nemzow~~ Free Crimea? [x] Yes or [ ] I want to get beaten up by those guys here looking where I make my cross. Stop insulting motherland! In: Lobby
Thread: Should Relic apologise for dishonoring Soviets in COH2?30 Mar 2015, 22:54 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2015, 22:35 PMpussyking Relic did dishonor soviet veterans of WW2 by portraying soviets as villains in COH2 main campaign. Did Relic apologise? You Russians amaze me... you never caught up on your history. September 1939: The Soviet Union INVADES Poland. November 1939: The Soviet Union INVADES Finland in the Winter war. April/May 1940: Massacre of Katyn. August 1944: The Red Army stops its advance on Warsaw. Reason for that is to ensure Poles fail in their fight against the Germans. This was only the first step to get rid of the Polish opposition and to establish a communist puppet state. You didn´t even need to get your hands dirty. Congratulations! February 1945 onwards: Mass rape of German women by the Red army. Stop acting like the Soviets didn´t have blood on their hands. Demanding an apology from a game company is ridiculous, even more so under the circumstances mentioned. Nobody bats an eye when Germans are portrayed in a critical light. And rightfully so. Because Germans have accepted their past and admit it was shameful. Lock this thread. In: Lobby
Thread: Ost so up.29 Mar 2015, 18:00 PM Any more competent Allied player would have finished the game within minutes. A fail attempt at justifying the crippled state Ostheer is in atm. In: Replays
Thread: OST Panzerwerfer: Truly Underpowered29 Mar 2015, 17:47 PM The Panzerwerfer was perfect right after the release in 2013. Why did they have to fiddle around with it? Just reverse it to its old state and increase the fuel cost to 100. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF wishes for patch28 Mar 2015, 10:37 AM I actually agree with Alex. 240 damage, 60 range is a lot. It totally locks down Ostheer T3. If anything it needs an adjustment, but definitely not a buff. More penetration, a bit more health and 160 damage should make it a good and reasonable unit. Atm if used right, it can totally negate any kind of armor in the game. In: Lobby
Thread: Real Talk: Panther25 Mar 2015, 18:02 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2015, 17:27 PMJHeartless Remember when it was "useless" due to nerfs it was given the Pen it now enjoys. Before it was "useless" it didnt have such a high Pen. So why does it get to enjoy it now? That argument is weak. It used to have high penetration before, even at range. Increasing the penetration further barely changed anything. Only in one situation it could have an effect (IS-2). A mild buff, not noticeable in 90% of all engagements. Imagine someone would like to increase the penetration of the the Jackson and to balance it, decrease its armor. That would in effect just be a buff, because everything penetrates anyway. The Panther was over-nerfed in the last patch. It still is WAY weaker than it used to be in 2013. Jump back to quoted post25 Mar 2015, 17:27 PMJHeartless And as I said before late war German metallurgy sucked. Fact. So there is your lore reason for less armor on the OKW side. That´s a myth. Fact. The quality on Panthers etc. remained largely good. The King Tiger had this problem though. In: Lobby
Thread: Real Talk: Panther24 Mar 2015, 21:13 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Mar 2015, 20:24 PMpussyking Panthers frontal armor is too damn thick. Bouncing off 50% of shots. Why shouldn´t it? Historically its frontal armor was almost impervious. It needs the frontal armor. If it goes back to the stage it was pre-patch, nobody is going to build it again. Smart Panther usage should be rewarded. And currently it is like this. No need to change it. German players who keep their Panther at range, facing the frontal armor to the enemy should win. In: Lobby