Profile of Omega_Warrior

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2561

General Information


Thread: M8 Greyhound5 Aug 2014, 23:26 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Aug 2014, 22:28 PMArclyte the recon commander is crap Forward obsevers: adds like 2 sight range, pretty negligible and doesn't really give any real advantage. I&R pathfinders: range on artillery is really low. Greyhound: good AI but useless in AT. Recon run: only useful ability Airdroped combat group: Gives two decent units and an empty AT gun. Way overpriced and useless that late in the game. So yeah, almost everything in it is pretty underpowered right now, which seems to be a trend with US doctrinal abilities and call-ins. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M8 Greyhound5 Aug 2014, 22:10 PM The 40 damage is rediculous. Went through all the trouble to hunt down a lone stuka, just to realize it would take 10+ shots to actually kill it and had to give up. It's good ai and scout unit, but I would happily pay a bit more so it would actually be useful against light armor, which it simply can't do right now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Next Commander Rotation: What is it?5 Aug 2014, 21:57 PM When are we going to get no retreat or tank hunters. Pls relic stop hiding these commanders. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: American off-map abilities need rework5 Aug 2014, 16:01 PM The I&R Pathfinders artillery isn't what needs tweaking. It's the range! They can only call it in as far as they can shoot. This means that they have to run straight into whatever it is they want to actually use the artillery on. Considering that they aren't really good for anything else and are a rather fragile squad this is pretty ridiculous. Especially when the major can do the same from the safety of behind the lines. Why waste manpower calling in a unit that does the same thing a unit I will have to eventually get by default can do better. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What happened to this b4 (see vid)?4 Aug 2014, 12:54 PM The shell never actually tracks the target like it should. Don't use it against a moving target or you will miss and waste a shit load of munitions In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Assault Engineers and Vehicle Crews are Useless4 Aug 2014, 03:34 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2014, 02:30 AMastro_zombie Yeah I agree with you Von. It seems like they want you to fight with them, but why? lol. It isn't clicking with me. I think they intended players to bail out of vehicles so that they can save the crew and still maintain an extra squad, but that situation is ridiculous. No player is going to risk a tank falling into the hands of their enemy just to save a glorified engineer unit. And even if they did 90 munitions is a lot to invest into crappy assault unit that will wipe if its even looked at funny. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is this really necessary? 4 Aug 2014, 03:22 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2014, 02:32 AMastro_zombie "On me!" makes your at guns and crewed weapons pack up and move. People actually use that? It works well as a way to engage a unknown force without risk a a full retreat since you can unsuppress your rifles if the run into HMGs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is this really necessary? 3 Aug 2014, 22:20 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Aug 2014, 22:12 PMspajn how come USA overcame the even better MG42 in vcoh without smoke then? Jeeps, mortars, and snipers. Of which they have none of in COH2. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is this really necessary? 3 Aug 2014, 21:42 PM Smoke isn't going anywhere. It's the US's only counter against MGs in the early game and they must delay tech to get it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What happened to the 240mm3 Aug 2014, 16:03 PM there is no change listed in the patch notes so I'm hoping it's purely cosmetic. Maybe it was to it was slowing down the game? In: COH2 Gameplay