Profile of PanzerGeneralForever

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1072

General Information
Steam: 76561198060148756
Game Name: PanzerGeneralForever


Thread: My solution for soviet t1.29 Mar 2016, 23:13 PM While we're at it lets just move stug to t1 too In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Rapid conscription is OP29 Mar 2016, 13:51 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2016, 12:44 PMDomine A good tactic against somebody that uses Rapid Conscription is to kill as much cons as you can and give him more squads than he is comfortable with. It will feed you vet and overload his manpower upkeep and his popcap. And lay down minefields everywhere. He can't have a sweepers everywhere at once and if he doesn't already have one hell have to purchase yet another infantry unit. The upkeep is real. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rapid conscription is OP29 Mar 2016, 02:09 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2016, 15:24 PMRollo free vet Almost free vet. The enemy has to spend 120 munis to activate the ability In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer in a bad spot ? 28 Mar 2016, 18:48 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2016, 08:21 AMStrummingbird Cromwell is cheaper, is 50% more accurate on the move on top of having higher base accuracy, extremely good at crushing, faster (and gets ludicrously fast with vet), has a smaller target size than any other medium tank, comes at a significantly lower tech cost, has nondoctrinal smoke, and has a gun that's noticeably better at penetrating other medium tanks. P4 starts to come into its own only after vet 2, and that's only against other medium vehicles and infantry AT weapons. Cromwell is by far the superior vehicle for cost. Agreed. The fact that the Cromwell is so fast makes it good at crushing units, circle strafing tanks, hunting down German rocket artillery, and getting out alive. The p4 can't really crush, can't circle strafe the generally faster allied tanks, Is too slow and expensive to hunt down rocket artillery and is needed for Ostheer to make any sort of offensive. I played a 4v4 as Brits last night and finished off 3 pwerfers, 7 stukas, 3 panthers, and 2 KTs with my cromwells. I lost 9 total. Cromwells are perfect for trading with the generally more expensive axis tanks. Also,their smaller target size (same as 222) makes it harder for heavies to hit them so they are excellent against tanks and infantry. Their non doc on the move spotting scopes are nice too And did I mention their free blitz? My Cromwell life expectancy wasn't that great that game... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: An idea on emplacements rework27 Mar 2016, 17:33 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2016, 10:28 AMAustralian Magic Removing brace is like removing retreat. Uh actually the OP is saying remove brace and add retreat. I agree with the OP. It solves the biggest problem regarding emplacements. Zero micro. Now, with the ability to move emplacements around it makes emplacements both more adaptable to the situation as well as ciunter able. I like it. Great solution. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer in a bad spot ? 27 Mar 2016, 17:24 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2016, 13:32 PMAerohank My main gripes with Ostheer are: - 4 man grenadier squads suffer too much from RNG wipes from explosive weapons. It's much easier to get a nice core of vet3 main infantry with the other factions than it is with Ostheer. I think grens should be 5 man squads instead of 4 man squads, with appropriate stat adjustments to make the unit as combat effective as it is now. - Brumbar is a bad unit. Its accuracy is sub-par and it has no other redeeming qualities. A panzerwerfer is a cheaper and better choice in 99% of gameplay scenarios. - Prostruppen spam is slightly too effective. Your point about grens is spot on In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger vs Pershing27 Mar 2016, 03:47 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2016, 03:27 AMvarunax Because people who are looking at which heavy tank has better acceleration or deceleration are looking at the wrong stats lol. That's like comparing penetration values of the bren carrier vs the kubelwagen. Sure bud In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tiger vs Pershing26 Mar 2016, 21:55 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Mar 2016, 20:53 PMNemesis10192 The Pershing is substantially faster (6 vs 4.7) substantially better acceleration (2 vs 1.5) and MASSIVELY better deceleration (4 vs 1.8). The pershing gains +30% accel/decel on vet 1 whereas the tiger gains +20% speed +20% accel/decel on vet 3. This leaves the tiger at vet 3 slower than the pershing (5.64) and with massively worse accel/decel. The pershing also gains its added nimbleness far earlier than the tiger. All in all the Pershing is substantially more mobile than the tiger. Thank you. Now people can make a better comparison between the two. I've always hated how ppl leave out these very relevant stats. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tiger vs Pershing26 Mar 2016, 20:47 PM Can we please tack on the Acceleration/ Deceleration, speed, target size, and turret traverse? Thanks In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Best bulletin 26 Mar 2016, 17:36 PM I've always liked triple cheap mines as ostheer. Before it was bugged tellers cost 41 munis. The S mines aren't bugged and cost 49. S mines are nice cuz you don't always have to make all of them so you can place down a square for 12 munis which I have seen wipe full squads. Depends on what you use the most I guess. I also like increased penetration for ATGs depending on what faction I am. Increased ROF for mg42 makes it suppress alot faster. If there was an increased speed on cromwells tho.... That would be my favorite cuz I love crushing units. In: COH2 Gameplay