Profile of Jilet

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 556

General Information


Thread: Firefly is too weak16 May 2021, 10:38 AM I do agree Firefly is a little weak but in contrast to other allied TDs. Currently though, the unit is better against the mediums than the heavies due to its lower penetration. In my opinion, all TDs should have 200 damage but slower reload times and less accuracy with more penetration. So that they still use the same shots to kill mediums while less accuracy causes them to miss more on agile and low target size mediums but longer time to kill them while being better against heavies due to less shots needed to kill while reliably penetrating them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - USF Feedback16 May 2021, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post16 May 2021, 03:48 AMKurobane Snares in general should be tuned to scale with Veterancy. For example Vet 0 units don't snare at all, while Vet 1 would be any vehicle below 50% HP, Vet 2 would be 75% and Vet 3 always snare. Granted these values can be adjusted but the point is Snaring should scale with the Unit Veterancy. Then losing your units is a death sentence. Although I agree the game should revolve around veterancy but that is just too much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar performance14 May 2021, 13:13 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 12:47 PMHannibal As I had to learn myself, frontal armor is not just the front, but the front half of the vehicle. The frontal half of the side armor is seen as "front armor". Therefore, the right StuG is always hitting the front armor, the left one is hitting the rear armor. That's why there is no "rear armor hit" pop up when the right one fires. . Bamboozeled. Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 12:47 PMHannibal But the StuG doesn't kill via high penetration, it kills via high ROF, especially when vetted. I know, just wanted to back my claims but learning that the front half is frontal armor is a shocker. Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 12:47 PMHannibal The StuG vs rear armor is overall a not very realistic scenario overall though. I tried the best case actually. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar performance14 May 2021, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 12:15 PMgeneral_gawain Why are the StuGs are shooting from the side? I thought putting it in a situation that is more realistic than getting to the back of the Churchill as a casemate tank was a better idea. But I'll do the thing later on when I'm available brother. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar performance14 May 2021, 11:56 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 07:25 AMleithianz Um.... you do realize 185 pen. against 180 armor means 100% pen. right...? Or is it me that gets everything wrong again? Yes. I ran this entire thing for you to see that it doesn't work that way and even installed bandicam and uploaded it to youtube only for you. You can clearly see 2 shots are deflecting and it is not 100% penetration. https://youtu.be/xmvpIaIK_Hw In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar performance14 May 2021, 08:08 AM I already tried to explain but keep going with your biased, ignorant and unconstructive way of thinking my guy. And the reason why the topic got derailed is because you keeping trying to mock me for unknown reason with your "arguments" even though I actively said I wanted to cut the churchill thing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar performance14 May 2021, 07:18 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 07:01 AMleithianz You are right on the matter (cause having p4 vs Churchill is in favor of Churchill obviously) the reason original author claimed was differ. I wanted to point out irony of clamming 240 armor as "bounces off everything" (180 in fact, because he claimed "rear") when we are speaking about one of the highest(312) armor unit in this thread. Are you illiterate ? I have never claimed that it bounces off everything. I said "Everything less than a Panther" since AT guns are out of the equation against Churchill. Have fun against Churchills with 50 Range 185 penetration StuGs against 180 REAR armor. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar performance14 May 2021, 06:21 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 06:14 AMleithianz Snip. I think you just don't get my point and say that I am "crying out" like an un-communicative person would do. So I'm leaving you there to not further derail this topic and with thoughts about how high the 180 REAR ARMOR is when combined with 1400 HP mister. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Soviet Feedback14 May 2021, 01:58 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 01:34 AMtheekvn No, thanks. Just leave T-34-85 alone. It is balanced now. T34/85 is fine. The doctrines it comes with are not so much however. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brummbar performance14 May 2021, 01:54 AM Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 01:39 AMleithianz You are speaking of 165 fuel tank that has same pen with Cromwell. Off the topic, but Churchill is nothing but a hp-pig with too much pop cap that it's hardly usable. Penetration is irrelevant for Brumbarr since it has a slow projectile that will 9/10 miss the moving tanks. Off topic again, but Churchill is still a gimmick unit that is 165 fuel and forces a Panther to be able to deal with it since everything else just bounces off even from its rear. Jump back to quoted post14 May 2021, 01:39 AMleithianz And does too well. Thought that was the point is it not? It bounces 2/3 of the shots from the Cromwell & 2/5 from the 6-pounder once it gets that + armor. With properly used(ground attack), single shot can make full-hp inf. force retreat. and 2~3 shot we see potential wipe here. No stock tank can do such thing other than Brumbarr. It's not hard to see OST going straight to the Brumbarr with 2 at ready even in pro-level plays (recent 2v2 tournaments). It should do too well. Unit is literally a specialist. Its cost and timing are also at the end of the spectrum. You are paying 150 fuel only to fight infantry. It is the Obersoldaten of the tanks. Has one and only one job, and it should do it too well with that cost. Any nerfs to current Brumbarrs combat performance and OST late game is certainly hammered since the unit is just so much of a reliance considering OST is designed around somewhat weak infantry that can not go toe to toe with late game allied infantry and Brum just addresses that. Edit: However, I can agree on something like a scatter nerf on the bunker busting barrage which is way too accurate IMO. In: COH2 Balance