Profile of Jilet

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 556

General Information


Thread: Panzerfusiliers Need Adjustments27 Aug 2019, 23:49 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 22:53 PMHannibal Yes, I see that point, but I think their overall performance is very good. So in my opinion reducing the MP cost can only work if they get nerfed for late game. But then you could basically buy just Volks. And as I said, of all the factions, OKW can take the early game blow due to their Sturmpioniere. Also I thought that vetted+upgraded (I know, 30 mun difference) Panzerfusiliere are better than Volksgrenadiere? This was basically the whole point of the redesign, wasn't it? Actually OKW is the faction that can NOT tolerate early losses because of their mid game weaknesses. Yes the sturmpioneer is strong but by any mistakes early with sturmpioneer you are screwed. (Sidenote : Maxim spam completely shut down OKW) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What the new balance patch got wrong?27 Aug 2019, 22:48 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 22:11 PMgbem The T70 doesnt fix the retarded infantry ptoblem Oh boy it does. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 22:48 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 22:00 PMGeblobt Some suggestions: Volksgrenadiers Swap the mp40 upgrade with the stg/mp44 upgrade. Reasoning: The stock mp44 upgrade has no real meaning. Its just there to buff volks on all ranges and gives them a pretty early power spike. There is not much tactical decisionmaking behind that.Additional to this swap vet 5 volks could get the obers k98 (from 12 to 16 dmg, dunno about acc). Then okw can decide between close range volks or long range volks. Mp40 behind mech/bg seems reasonable. The mp44 upgrade could then be buffed to double bar lvl + cost increase+higher cp requirements. . I think you meant to say swap STG44 with MP40. With the ober kar98 at vet5 it might be interesting. I liked that idea. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfusiliers Need Adjustments27 Aug 2019, 22:44 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 22:21 PMHannibal But the thing is early power means fuel control thus early LV lead etc. The main problem of the PF is they can be build less thus less map control on top of that they are worse than volks which makes the situation even worse. If you try to replace them later on as your mainline, already vetted volks will still outperform them. The issue that needs to be adressed is their initial MP cost since you already trade your early power but you get further punished by the manpower IMO. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfusiliers Need Adjustments27 Aug 2019, 21:59 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 21:49 PMSkysTheLimit No you don't. You pay that much to unlock mechanised tech AND fusilier upgrades You pay 300mp and 30 fuel for JUST Rifleman upgrades. Nothing else Yet you start with less fuel on OKW etc. this fight can rage on indefinently. So lets just focus on the topic. IMO they must be at volks level for 280 MP. Seriously a squad that get sprint compared to self heal on vet is no good when compared. Add in the STG upgrade being toooooo cost efficient compared to G43 upgrade. My suggestion is : Reduce Pfusi cost to 260mp add 20MP cost to G43 upgrade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfusiliers Need Adjustments27 Aug 2019, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 21:51 PMStug life lol p fusi have the same vet as penal, they scale about the same as rifle And on a 5 vet scale... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfusiliers Need Adjustments27 Aug 2019, 21:48 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 21:38 PMSkysTheLimit For like the 3rd time why are you comparing fusiliers to Pathfinders and Ass engies? Edit: i see your latest post Your Rifleman example makes no sense. What's my cp0 alternative to rifleman? I have a scout or an engineer squad, neither serves as an alternate mainline Snare, scaling, multiple upgrade paths, justifies the cost. Not just snares Rifleman have to spend 300mp and 30 fu just to unlock their upgrades, that's not a great argument either For Pfusi you pay total of 300mp 60 fuel to unlock your upgrade tho. (Cuz T1 rush will be dominated by allied LVs) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: UKF September patch discussion27 Aug 2019, 21:44 PM The thing that makes Bofors (and actually other emplacements too) is the brace ability. It just turns in a loop. 0> Build. 1> If there is an engagement where bofors will win then cool if not go step 2 2> Brace. Throw the cheap base arty or send in reinforcement or use commander abilities. Won ? Go to step 3. Lost ? Go to step 4. 3> Go to step 1. 4> Lose the game. Remove the brace ability or lock it behind garrison bonus (Forward HQ does not count) Lower its fuel price or maybe change the fuel with muni. Keep stats as it is. Now we have a non-cancer, fairly counterable, not horrendously expensive to lose building. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on OKWs Flak Half Track27 Aug 2019, 16:54 PM Also as a sidenote it continues to drift into enemy when starting to set up. I mean it starts setting up at max range but drifts into enemy snare range by the time it finishes the set up. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfusiliers Need Adjustments27 Aug 2019, 16:50 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 16:39 PMthedarkarmadillo If you compare literally any infantry against volks you will come to that conclusion... The issue is less with fussies than it is with volks. You could have call in riflemen clones and volks would still be favored because volks are cheaper and there is nothing you would want mainline infantry to do they can't do. Actually that is true. But thats because the lack of the opener MG just like the USF both factions are either OP or thrash because of that. I get it it is because of the uniqueness stuff but it is also the reason why both factions are abyssmal to balance. As a sidenote : It makes no sense OST the biggest army germans assembled has 4 men grens but manpower lacking OKW has 5 men volks. Actually it would be quite interesting what would happen if OKW had 4 men mainline. In: COH2 Balance