Profile of Jilet

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 556

General Information


Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion23 Aug 2019, 14:52 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2019, 14:02 PMgbem (since soviet teching is more expensive) No thats because OST is going T1 for that build. I agree SOV T2 is weak but considering Shocks/Guards at 2 CP and penals at T1 it seems a little fair. I would gladly agree changing cons veterancy and flares. >Split the cons vet3 RA between vet1 and vet3 (10/30 respectively) thus make them more viable early and scale easier >Give the tripwire flare behind molotov >Nerf the penal RA improve their PTRS vs tanks so they are glass cannons early but potent at unit later >Improve the maxim suppression to vickers levels but nerf its pack/set up times. >Reduce ZiS to 300 MP. I guess this is more appealing to every SOV player. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht September patch discussion23 Aug 2019, 11:41 AM As Derby said. Was pretty hyped yesterday but now looking shocks etc. will be quite useless against them. Maybe better convert the 20% DR to 10% DR + 10-15% RA ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion22 Aug 2019, 23:48 PM Pershing really needs a slight HP buff just as Tiger I needs a frontal armor buff. Pershing feels like a LV and Tiger feels like getting always penetrated from front. Both are thrash compared to Churchill or KT. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion22 Aug 2019, 23:29 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2019, 22:54 PMgbem Theres something i just realized... by tying 7 man tech to T3... the T34 rush strategy (skipping the T70) has been delayed by 25 fuel... Recommend allowing T4 to automatically unlock 7 man cons while T3 retains the option with tech Agreed. Otherwise P4's will roflstomp the infantry and get their veterancy when the T34 hits the field. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion22 Aug 2019, 23:28 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2019, 22:45 PMMazianni The post of the DoomLord52. Read it. Comparing Pack Howi (which was notorious) to PGrens... Nice gotta say. I am NOT saying that OST can not fight fight back the indirect fire. I am saying that indirect fire hurts OST much more than other factions since its so called "combined arms" tactics heavily rely on static compositions like PAK/MG/Mortar/LMG Grens. Can you say a faction that doesn't rely on combined arms and just a-moves a single unit ? And yes it takes a horrendous amount of time to aim with LMG-42. Gonna cut this pointless conversation. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What the new balance patch got wrong?22 Aug 2019, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2019, 21:08 PMgbem if maxim spam is viable... then MG42 spam must be godlike but ive had trouble with neither of these builds soo the problem here isnt with the spam... That is where the rotation pack/set up times kick in. I am all in for buffing maxim to MG-42 levels by nerfing its packup/setup/rotation times. This way SOV can now have a proper gun to support cons early so cons can scale to late without getting absolutely chrushed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion22 Aug 2019, 19:49 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2019, 19:45 PMMazianni A lovely ancedote where the rng mortar round managed to land a direct hit and DID NOT KILL THE SQUAD. And it's all on you if your retreat path isn't clear. Sure thing. But your biased eyes are just forgetting the grens MUST BE STATIONARY TO FIRE THE LMG OTHERWISE THEY ARE USELESS which eleminates the RNG factor of mortar shells thus they WILL be hit exclusively more than other infantry by the mortars. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion22 Aug 2019, 19:42 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2019, 19:39 PMMazianni A SINGLE MORTAR CAN NOT KILL A SQUAD MOVE YOUR FUCKING UNITS Well 120mm mortar may want to have words with you. Just got my grens reduced to 1hp by the mortar while vaulting the fence. Guess what ? They got sniped one by one on the retreat. Was painful to watch... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion22 Aug 2019, 19:38 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2019, 19:36 PMMazianni Damage reduction for Grens Are you fucking kidding me? Are grenades just supposed to be fucking worthless versus grens now? Jesus Christ, reduce their reinforcememt time and cost at vet 3 if you want, but this damage reduction nonsense, especially after we literally just got done removing it from Rangers, and right after all the indirect fire nerfs to USF and Soviets. Why would anyone think this is a good idea? I mean? Because they are a 4man core infantry that blows up with a single mortar in EVERY. SINGLE. GAME. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: September Balance Patch preview [SPBP] - general discussion22 Aug 2019, 19:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Aug 2019, 18:46 PMSander93 SEPTEMBER 2019 PATCH PREVIEW - Version 1.2 Changes August 22nd 2019 Grenadiers - Experimental Change We think Grenadiers are in a good spot in terms of their combat performance, but with only 4 models, they get wiped too easily once heavy indirect fire and big guns start roaming the battlefield. We’d like to trial a change that replaces their veterancy 3 Received Accuracy with a Damage Reduction modifier. This should help Grenadiers survive explosions damage in the late game, without really having an impact on their durability versus small arms fire. - Veterancy 3 -23% Received Accuracy replaced by -20% damage reduction FINALLY ! Now Grens can survive lategame artifest. In: COH2 Balance