Profile of Crells

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 255

General Information


Thread: KV8's Flamers16 Jun 2013, 12:49 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Jun 2013, 11:45 AMNullist @Crells: All vehicle carried flame effects are currently too effective at retreat killing. Happy now? The KV-8 as pointed out is not quick enough to chase you down. the m3 with CE can A) be killed inside the vehicle, though slower, and B) it is extremly easy to kill to all forms of AT, you faust it and it will be backing away, if it chases a retreating squad too long you can move another form of at to bring it down. The flametrack is hard to bring down, at nades do little damage to it, it can surive to shots from a zis giving it more than enough time to back away. I agree that flames in general are too strong vs retreating infantry but the flametrack is the worst of the worst in this regard. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV8's Flamers16 Jun 2013, 10:53 AM I dont hear Germans complaining about hte flametrack flaming down retreating units. 3 squads on cons and sniper, moment i saw the flametrack flank me i T'd everything (no at nades) i lost 2 squads of cons, my snipers and the other squad was reduced to 3.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flamer Half Track15 Jun 2013, 17:02 PM which is forcing you into t2, i think it would be good if penal's could get a shrek type upgrade, at least we would then have some nin doctrinal at on inf In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flamer Half Track15 Jun 2013, 16:15 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Jun 2013, 04:04 AMGreenDevil Anyone mind telling me how to counter it? Without having to build the support building or start with the support building instead of a Rifle Company? You can not, a good oponant will not use munis on fausting if you use m3's and hte glaftrack simply outclasses the m3 with a CE, whY?? because the ce's get roasted, albeit a little slower but still die. once that happens you get pushed off the map, and hte only way soviets win is by having more map controll, the soviet units dont stand toe to toe (non doctrinal) and after that flametrack is out you are screwed if you spent any fuel. you need to rush either a su 74 or a t70 and use no fuel on anything else meaning no molotovs no AT nades. I really cant understand how they left the flametrack out of the balance patch In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Patch 15 Jun 2013, 14:47 PM i cant explain it but germans seem alot better now. i find my self having to tech t4 all the time to deal with the armour. ostwinds that didnt get change rape everything in the soviet army except the su85, they can take 4 shots from a zis and still keep going giving it plenty of time to run past it and kill it. panzers come alot quicker and the t34 just wont cut it. what is the role of the t34? it is too expensive to tech t3 and t4 uintill late late game and soviets NEED the tank destroyer or they can not deal with enemy armour. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flamer Half Track15 Jun 2013, 06:19 AM persoanlly i would not mind switching mines. making a minefield all over a VP or fuel point is great area denial. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flamer Half Track15 Jun 2013, 04:49 AM t70 froom t3 or the su 74 from t4. guards + at nade + button. lure it into a mineÆ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV8's Flamers15 Jun 2013, 03:51 AM it is just as deadly as the flametrack twin flamethrowers i find, its just alot harder to kill In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfaust vs RPG-4314 Jun 2013, 18:32 PM And a panzerfaust would disable a t34 in 1 hit, they were also only 1 use items. This game is not historically accurate In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How do i remove mines?14 Jun 2013, 03:52 AM i hear running conscripts over mines clears them quickly In: COH2 Gameplay