Profile of Hux

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 505

General Information


Thread: British marketing is coming!!!5 Jul 2015, 01:58 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2015, 00:42 AMPuppetmaster Yeah, you're right. I completely forgot about the balance that we can't see... What the actual fuck are you talking about? If you can't see it how can you even begin to measure whether something is balanced or not? In: Lobby
Thread: British marketing is coming!!!3 Jul 2015, 13:15 PM Inb4 6th faction is just a re-worked PE. Same factions, same maps, same(ish) engine. Is this turning into the same damned game or what? 10 years on and we've still essentially got the same game as before. Mention of past patches and the weird metas that evolved really hit home just how much of a clusterfuck this games development trajectory has been. Sometimes I wish I didn't love this franchise so dearly.. Please don't be imbalanced, please don't be imbalanced. In: Lobby
Thread: Tank smoke.27 Jun 2015, 14:28 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Jun 2015, 14:18 PMPurlictor I know this has been brought up countless times, but are we ever going to see a change to tank smoke? It is a skilless, get-out-of-jail-free ability that ignores bad play and is heavily RNG influenced. The only counter play is attack grounding which is extremely inaccurate and straight up broken on certain maps due to the geometry. Players need never be afraid of overextending into ATGs, Su-85s and Jacksons when they can get away scot-free. It is neither an exciting ability nor is it being used as an aggressive tool which I'm sure Relic intended it to be used as. I'd suggest making the vehicle only able to pop smoke if has no critical applied to it. This way we would see it more as an offensive tool than the phase plasma shield it is now. This also applies to blitz (even though it was nerfed on heavies iirc). Blitz isn't as bad since the tank is still hittable, but the solution here is simple: Don't let the tank use blitz when reversing. I think the cant have been crit'd thing is a bit much. Although I do agree its a bit too easy. Having to manually aim it, like the Sherman has to would go a long way to making this ability more balanced. Using it offensively would mean a much larger level of micro, especially if being used by multiple vehicles simultaneously. I'd be happy for it to be that way. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: MonolithicBacon's Irregular Update No.427 Jun 2015, 11:24 AM Gotta love a good looking map. In: News
Thread: Ideas for new commanders27 Jun 2015, 10:58 AM An Allied air based commander would be nice, I know we have airbourne but it's mostly ground based. Some kind of 'resistance' commander for the allies would be pretty nice also that worked like partisans (but don't suck major dick) that could be used to plant mines etc etc. I m not too keen on jst sticking call-ins into commanders. don't get me wrong, call in tanks are sweet but that's how we got to this stage in the first place In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Sturmoffizier Vet?27 Jun 2015, 10:52 AM at vet 5 he should get a second Luger or P38 (whichever he has) that would be brilliant, just tearing shot up. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic: June 23rd Update: About Balance23 Jun 2015, 10:51 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2015, 10:36 AMKatitof More like Russia vs the rest of the world. He's right. People need to chill out about this. If you really don't want to play until all the new patch changes are implemented then that's what you should do. I understand the concerns and love for the game and coming back and all- cant argue with that... Game isn't getting worse... (I hope LoL!) In: Lobby
Thread: Relic: June 23rd Update: About Balance23 Jun 2015, 08:10 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Jun 2015, 07:51 AMKreatiir I (and others) left the game/scene. When you 'leave the scene' but still come back to post... OT I get what Relic are saying but it would be nice if they could give us some timeframe on when the rest of this is going to be rolled out (I.e no soon bs). A mass boycott f online play would be nice to see if it would force their hand a little, alas this is the internet though I guess.. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June22 Jun 2015, 13:52 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2015, 13:05 PMEsxile ATnade snaring only light vehicle is a nice change, it is still a powerful AT early game but lose its effectivness late game like many early game upgrades Wait, do I have this right? I thought Faust will still damage engine on medium/heavy armour as long as the Faust shot itself takes the vehicle's health to less than 75%. That's how I interpreted the change.. someone clarify this for me, please. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch notes for 23rd June21 Jun 2015, 08:00 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2015, 05:13 AMAlexzandvar I would be happy if they just out right removed infantry based snares and made AT nades/fausts do a FUCK ton of damage (but have very short range) so if you let infantry get up close and personal with your tanks you would be punished. +1 I think AT nades should only do damage. Perhaps they shouldn't be auto aiming either so they are more based on skill than anything else and by hitting the top turret/back of the tank the grenade does bonus damage. This would mean infantry could engage armour from behind hedges and from ambushes provided they had LoS instead of charging out into the open. To negate the risk of crushing of large numbers of infantry perhaps decreasing the reactions of models when a vehicle is incoming would make them automatically jump out the way quicker. In: Lobby