What would you replace its vet I with then? Extra speed? 
I'm not sure. I would say received accuracy to make up for lack of green cover but maybe its at vet 2 or 3, not sure what the rak vet does off the top of my head
I don't understand why Allied players overrate the Raketen so much, the Pak40 is so much better. Is it really that hard to reverse move your AT gun?
I'm not overrating it, I just think a lot of people underrate it. And yeah the Pak40 is the best ATG in the game, of course I'd rather have one lol
What about the (far better) camo that Soviet AT guns can get through doctrines? I mean, I wouldn't be opposed to replacing the Rak's Camo with some other ability, I very rarely use the Camouflage.
Also: As Spoof said, I think I'd rather have the PAK40 than the Raketen, Target Weak Point, along with (universally?) better statistics is something I'd absolutely trade for the ability to retreat the damn thing.
I dont think any atg should have camo so i'd support removing it from those as well. Some could argue "well its doctrinal" but even still, I think from a design stand point, atg and camo shouldnt mix. Now camo and AT infantry on the other hand, I think thats a cool idea and can give the same effect.
|
|
I think axis players are too hard on the Rak, its a nice little ATG, very underrated.
I would remove the camo from it though. I dont think camo and anti-tank gun should be mixed but thats just my opinion lol. |
Sometimes I wonder what would happen if Seeking was some Eastern European or Asian guy without this level of popularity.
I can guarantee he would have been banned 10 times already.
Instead, so many people are coming out claiming he was treated unfairly because people rightfully call him out for cheating.
Not even mentioning the fact that he has played on an account that belongs to a guy with 3 VAC bans and is confirmed coh2 map hacking. Not only has he played on said account, he has also played on the computer on which the maphack was(is) installed. I don't even know what to say at this point.
Incredible double-standards by the community as well as the people that are responsible for actually banning coh2 accounts.
1000% if this evidence was submitted about a player with Chinese characters for a steam name and vac bans on his account, they’d be banned. Immediately. |
Can you elaborate.
It's not like the doc is bad or anything but does not have a reason to be chosen. I'd like to make 1 suggestion.
change the p4 IST with P4 J that should give it a decent reason to be chosen. Sure it might be OP considering there nija panzers, ju87d's as well as recon.
*ps: also some kind of overhaul for tactical movement would be nice.
Probably the fact you think your own suggestion is OP lol. Blitzkrieg is fine anyway, you said it yourself. You just want it stronger for ~~reasons~~ |
Brosras isn't the only one who clipped. And all the other top players who also thought he was cheating are capable of thinking for themselves...
Yeah and the guy that is saying Brosras is biased is actually a friend of Kimbo/Seeking. Thats what that crew is running with "Asha and Brosras just mad cause we were stream sniping them all day l0l"
pretty transparent though. |
The proof of fog of war consistency that I talked about yesterday is in minute 18 and about 40 seconds of A_E’s main video, it compares 2 perspectives of the same game between two people, one in Greece and one in the UK, to show there’s no difference in fog of war.
https://youtu.be/GzkzK7OK0lE
Great vid. Apologists will still try and use de-sync to create plausible deniability. Fact is like AE said, when you boost a dudes account with 3 VAC bans, mod that player in your twitch stream who then bans players discussing the controversy, its p obvious whats going on l0l. |
You will probably only see the territory flash IN GAME. Not spectating a replay. So it does not flash in the video.
Seems like an odd assumption to make, im sure someone here can confirm if you will see flashing points cap in replay, but seeing as fuel was already finished capping, it wouldnt be flashing anyway right?
The point where Seeking is making bags touches the south fuel and south cutoff.
The south cutoff was already taken before the fuel is taken. So Seeking would have known at 1:25 game time that there is a squad to his south west (cutoff) and to his south (fuel).
True but then the question is, if its all game sense related and you knew you were getting pushed on, why move your volks to create 1/3rd of a sandbag on a point, and desperately cancel them in seemingly herculean reaction times, when he could have created a much better engagement for himself
The southwest squad can either go to the mid VP or the point Seeking is on. A smart player would converge their two squads at the point Seeking is on (to out number the enemy). Because they would also see a flashing territory and know Seeking is there.
If I was Seeking I would have pulled back probably earlier than he did. But he may have been looking at something else or was waiting to see if the mid VP area started flashing.
yeah exactly, if seeking knew that he wouldnt have bagged that point on autopilot which makes me believe the cancel cant come from game sense. a high level gamesense tells you not to bag that point at that moment if you knew what you're claiming he likely did.
The problem is WE dont have the replays, so we have these spectate games where the operator is flashing the FOW on/off. You have no context as to what happened before that may have been a clue to Seeking. And how can we expect Seeking to remember every detail of games from a week or two ago??? I dont remember 15 minutes ago 
Not try to battle with u btw, just discussing it out, sometimes things make a lot more sense in our head before we say them out loud. |
Looking at AEs video at game time 1:25 he pauses.
At this point Seeking may have seen the territory switch from flashing RED to solid white. So you know something just capped/is capping that point and is probably moving towards you.
In my test below, the territory flashed red then turns solid white when captured.
Just a thought. I have about 4 hours of sleep so take it with a grain of salt 
EDIT:
I use this mechanic all the time in 4v4, but dont pay attention to the details of how it works. I just see the colors and know something is there.
EDIT #2:
The cutoff was already taken and Seeking would have saw that also. So he would really know someone is headed his way soon.
I just rewatched the clip and at no point does the fuel point start flashing red and when they untick fog of war you can see its already capped. Also his cutoff wasn't taken, the one youre referring to is south base cutoff. Rewatch the video, his cutoff is in vision almost the whole time and no enemy squad touches it that I see. |
In this image my volks are exactly where Seekings Volks were. I used Cheatmods so my base is in the south, yes.
I have volks on the sandbag point. I have REs on the fuel capping it.
Ye i edited my comment as I realized I had the map flipped in my head. |
Looking at AEs video at game time 1:25 he pauses.
At this point Seeking may have seen the territory switch from flashing RED to solid white. So you know something just capped/is capping that point and is probably moving towards you.
In my test below, the territory flashed red then turns solid white when captured.
Just a thought. I have about 4 hours of sleep so take it with a grain of salt
EDIT:
I use this mechanic all the time in 4v4, but dont pay attention to the details of how it works. I just see the colors and know something is there.
EDIT #2:
The cutoff was already taken and Seeking would have saw that also. So he would really know someone is headed his way soon.
EDIT: disregard, I got the directions messed up. |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
