Profile of Firesparks

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1930

General Information


Thread: schreck spam and allied inf spam20 Dec 2015, 08:04 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Dec 2015, 07:17 AMIA3 - HH in fact i dont know why some allies players constantly complain for volks scherck spam, we axis players never say anything about allied inf heavy spams allied infantry have much weaker anti-tank weapon. The axis typically don't have to worry about bazooka killing their tanks. a schreck spam powerful enough can and will one shot tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: schreck spam and allied inf spam20 Dec 2015, 04:37 AM USF rifleman spam because it's really the only thing that works. I hate the terminator veterancy but the USF would need something else if the terminator vet is taken away. previously OKW schreck spam because it's the only thing that works. Okw schreck spam now because it's still one of the best strategy. it's not like you can do much else with volks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Cromwell too good for the cost19 Dec 2015, 23:46 PM the only nerf the cromwell should ever take is the gun penetration. its speed and smaller size is what allow it to remain viable even into the late game against the axis. The sherman technically have better a better gun, but its size and slower speed doom it to mediocrity. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 50. Cal and Vickers vs OKW19 Dec 2015, 23:38 PM it's not the running speed. it's the grenade range. grenade in coh1 typically have a throw range of 15 meters, and mg range is 45 meter. in coh2 grenade throw are generally 20 meters while the mg range remain at 45. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Churchill armor19 Dec 2015, 23:18 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2015, 22:54 PMLeepriest Ostheer has the f2 and the okw has the J version. ostheer have the Late G or H OKW have the J. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Enough is enough, fix the volks19 Dec 2015, 08:59 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2015, 08:37 AMRemo I have actually never seen that happen ever. replay? Also keep in mind 1919 is doctrinal, this falls into the same arguments of various counters Wehrmacht players would suggest to Soviet players back when Wehrmacht was far better yet all the suggestions were doctrinal. You can't use doctrines as a counter to anything because you won't always have the doctrines available. Pigeon holing yourself is like literally the #1 no-no in RTS games since the beginning of time. unfortunately, there's a world of difference between the m1919a6 and the bar. The m1919a6 isn't an alternative to the bar, it's basically an upgrade. terminator rifles with m1919a6 are terrifying to fight. I think the volks need to lose the schreck and the rifleman need to lose their terminator vet inexchange for a bar buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sherman Firefly19 Dec 2015, 02:14 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Dec 2015, 02:04 AMsiuking666 I don't believe you not much can be said if you don't believe in facts. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sherman Firefly18 Dec 2015, 23:28 PM the Firefly does have one major advantage. It's the most accurate tank gun in the game. Even on the move it retain a 80% accuracy rate. although missing with a 10 second reload would make it pretty much useless. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sherman Firefly18 Dec 2015, 22:05 PM nerf the tulip and make the firefly cheaper ( 350 mp 125 fuel). if the firefly get an actual buff it's just going to crowd out the axis medium. The Firefly is also the most fraigle unit at that price range. It's not a straight glass cannon like the jackson, but considering its price it might as well be. Even with a 8-7 second reload the firefly is still going to lose to the jpz4. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 50. Cal and Vickers vs OKW18 Dec 2015, 11:51 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Dec 2015, 23:09 PMLemonJuice In the early game when ever model loss counts towards setting the pace of the rest of the game, I find the Vickers very advantageous since it's capable of forcing mg42s off in a green vs green fight or structure vs structure The vicker sniper model a bit better. Even assuming that's true it's still worst at suppressing than the mg42. It's better in certain situation but worst in other, so it should cost the same at best. Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2015, 09:03 AMRiCE I think MGs are good as they are. Indeed they are different. Vickers have better damage, their vet+garrison range bonus is great. Sure they have less suppression than MG42, but no one said those two should be the same. So i think no change needed at all. as best it's different, yet the vicker is more expensive. At least lower the price to 260 if the vicker is not actually superior. If I'm paying 20 mp more for a hmg, I expect it to be better. Jump back to quoted post18 Dec 2015, 00:13 AMnodickwilliams If 50 cal and vickers were to become as good at suppression as the mg42, you make it extremely difficult for okw to fight mgs. Unless you want to give volks grenadiers smoke nades that is. the .50cal arrive much later than the other mg. The OKW can comfortably get a LeIG at around the same time as the USF get their .50cal. The OKW have vastly better mobility over the british. It's basically the classic US vs Wehr scenario. In: COH2 Balance