Profile of ZeroZeroNi

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1563

General Information


Thread: USF Pathfinders need to be balanced21 Jun 2021, 16:50 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 16:45 PMthekessvn Lmao, then watch that replay first. why does anything funny happen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Can we have Path becom call in pak howis??21 Jun 2021, 16:48 PM I mean you spend 80 muni to call in Para who by the time they come gets nuked by the vetted upgraded infantry. And their own upgrades are expensive as hell. Can we not separate the the Para and pak howi call in. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Pathfinders need to be balanced21 Jun 2021, 16:44 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 13:32 PMMMX Pathfinders OP? That's certainly a new one. Yeah, in team game they are a pain in the ass for Ost. Cant do anything to em. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 16:40 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 16:16 PMHannibal To be honest I'd rather end it at this point since you have not shown much reasoning and either have thrown around unproven statements or even insults. I don't see any point in continuing that way. You want reason fine. You can be ok with the fact that brits can tap a button and negate the effect of 200+ muni cost ability or nullify all incoming damage to the point repairing it is faster and yet the unit can still retain all the benefits of it's axis counter part while also not being de-crew able, having 40+ more hp. Yet you are not ok with a mere bunker sometimes being able not be penned and killed(that's completely due to how coh2 works btw) by a 35 muni grenade. How am I suppose interpret this anything other way than you having double standards for allies and axis. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 16:11 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 16:07 PMHannibal Nonsense. There is nothing "cheesy" about throwing a nade into a bunker, and if you seriously want to vent some alleged huge Allied bias on a tiny and very specific discussion about weird/unintuitive in-game behaviour, then go ahead. But don't blame others if in the end you make your own argument look bad by throwing around accusations and insults. Right, you are a mod so you get to be a Hypocrite, while I can't say the truth. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 15:45 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 15:32 PMmr.matrix300 Well tbf this really looks and feels strange. In my opinion the light gammon bomb should deal a bit of damage (and so should Bundle to Sov. Bunker ... if it doesn't already) It does, it's just a rare case of the nade failing to pen the bunker. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 15:11 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 12:56 PMHannibal Because apparently only bunkers have this issue (correct me there if I am wrong, but I think that is the case). Fighting positions get reliably damaged by nades as intended as you said yourself below. Bunkers and fighting positions have nothing to do with British emplacements and their ability to brace, nor with the 17pd or the PaK43. Yes, It's irrelevant. When allied structures that cost same and have laundry list of advantages over the axis ones for the same cost its fine non issue, but a axis structure a slight avantage and can't be cheesed by a 35 muni ability that's is somehow a problem. What a fucking hippocryte. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 10:46 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 08:24 AMHannibal I agree with OP, there should be something like deflection damage but only vs buildings or functionally similar to that. He is only complain about bunkers and why wasn't destroyed by a 1s fuse ability. He's not complaining about all structures axis and allies. So I can't support his one-sided farce. And none of these points matter if it comes to the question if grenades are supposed to work like this against structures. I think bundle nades do some damage vs fighting positions and soviet bunkers. but Remember Brit emplacements can't be 1 clicked like the axis ones. So there is no way to judge if that is fair or not. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?21 Jun 2021, 10:30 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 08:03 AMredfox Where did you get that from or when did you make that up? I dont understand how allied AT has anything to do with Allies paying the same and getting a worse tank than axis for that money. Axis have by far enough AT options to fend a Pershing off, do you want me to list them for you? I dont even see an argument here, it's ridiculous. It's tit for tat m8. Aliied don't get to have tanks that can go against axis tanks the same way axis infantry don't get to go against allied ones. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?21 Jun 2021, 07:54 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 05:45 AMZeroZeroNi No, Ostheer doesn't have 60 range TDs. OKW doesn't have 60 range ATGs. AEF has both. OK, why are Rifles so much more powerful than grens and volks cause MG42. Why are OST and OKW elite infantry so much worse than Allied one cause MG42. So in that Very same reason Pershing should not be any closer to tiger due to 60 Range Ultra Mobile Turreted TD like the Jackson. In: COH2 Balance