I've played a game where my teammate went for the exact same strat. Got nuked to hell time and time again by 3x stukas and then by sturmtiger locking the point on Rheine 3v3. From what I have seen, being mobile and playing across the field is the way to go vs scott + path zooks. Path zooks are extremely vulnerable to any sort of infantry or AI and scotts can't auto attack over sight blockers. I've seen people lose hard doing that s*** in 3v3. You don't dive zooks. Weak as they are, they can easily be spammed. The moment I see somebody using the path+scott combo I assume they are a massive noob. And if a player loses against it, even a bigger noob. Cancerous as it is, it's still a spam strategy, and all spam strategies are weak.
armor does not work because zooks + maybe occasional Jackson. Infantry does not work, because Scotts. Stukas are great, but they are questionable value vs competent opponent that has mobile army
Here is a POV from from good 2v2 player, btw this is not his first match vs this strat:
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/1169866360?t=03h52m41s
The issue is you can't simply outplay this in any traditional style + it is kind of ridiculous to think that you can get away with spamming mobile indirect. Cali spam can be annoying, but at least you can dive it, they have long reload + they are much more fragile and less mobile. Other indirect spams are either extremely fragile, or can be mitigated simply by repositioning (like lefh spam)