|
UKF's nade have a 10 fuel side tech and cost 25 muni per use. I'm fully aware that infiltration nade is doctrinal and required special conditions to be use but 20 muni for 5 nade is quite cheap. Increased up to 25 will be OK. |
6? How could this be possible?
Ass gren can be up to 6 man. |
I agree that moving all of the emplacements to the Advanced Emplacements Regiment for example and just renaming it to simply Emplacements Regiment might be a good and feasible idea.
However you did not mention what to replace the Valentine with in the Royal Artillery Regiment commander.
Or better yet the AEC can just be unlocked from the get go but will probably need to be tweaked in it's balance stats. So there would be no need to choose anything, Valentine will stay as it is.
We can have two versions of the valentine. Or, replace the valentine in royal arty by "designated arty command vehicle". |
|
I suggest the following changes to replace emplacement in ukf's lineup:
The easiest is mortar emplacement, replace it by USF's mortar in T2.
The other two is trickier:
For the bofor, i suggest replace it with a rework valentine. Make side tech in T2 choice between fast AT vehicle (AEC) or slow infantry support vehicle. AEC will be Puma clone, les effective vs infantry, while valentine will be AI oriented with more durability. To be more specific, Valentine will have 550-600 HP, speed reduce to 4.8, 80 dmg main gun, improve MG/AOE and smoke pot.
For the 17pdr, i suggest a slightly buff to firefly, mostly turret rotation. Tulips rocket move to hammer, while anvils provide hull down.
After all above, all emplacements can be put in Commanders and rework accordingly. |
|
The best way is to move emplacements out of UKF's stock line up, into a Commander, then working with them as Commander unit/abilities. |
Yea, I think that's what happened, maybe they cached up every point too.
Was pretty bullshit, obviously far more powerful than a 13-min Wehrmacht Panzer IV J (that thing can't even scratch Infantry, and obviously would lose to a T34/85 in no time at all.)
Oh well, that's what you get with large teamgames I guess. Just seemed absurd.
Wasn't a troll thread at all, I was just tilted at the match. Guess next time we'll have to be more aggressive in killing caches.
I saw 15 minutes king tiger before, when my team and the other team each hold a fuel point, so what ? |
So people can use tactics to kill a Jagtiger...why is this a problem again?
When being smart as an allies player become a balance issue. 10/10 of troll, dude. |
|
Post in bugs report thread. Things like this always happen after large patch like this. |
No it is not that difficult especially with the current raketen outranging the bofors but the time and investment needed to take out the bofors was higher than the bofors' cost. That was my point my man.
I got your point. But with the new patch which just come live, i thing we can both be happy and move on. You have more mean to counter bofor with new rak. I have reliable suppression with the new bofor without deleting squad. |
You actualy got the point. Brace is there so you cant 1 click delete any emplacement, since they cant retreat.
I will take back what i said about you blobbing (an other overreact by me, sorry)
But i have to ask, Is it that difficult to get 2 ig or mortar and set them barrage after each other ?
|
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
