Profile of Bulgakov

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 987

General Information
Steam: 76561198061121041


Thread: Domination until ISU5 Jul 2014, 08:49 AM Thanks for watching! Yes, you've made some good points. I agree with: "I don't see your total domination" - you're right, it wasn't total. That was hyperbole. I still say we had the upper hand. What I should have said was that I killed several full squads and lost only a field gun that I recrewed. "First time when you poked with the Panther he only had atguns there, your fusiliers could have cleared it." I partly agree. I would love to walk into an ISU held area with infatry to take out the AT. That is the CoH dream! The point is that you can't! WIPE WIPE WIPE. Things I don't agree with: "Amount of damage is always higher on Axis side. This is down to faction design" Number of kills, yes. Amount of damage - no. Damage is a very accurate indicator of performance regardless of which faction you play. "(Panther) You made a bad teching choice. Puma's fulfill the early TD role much better than a panther" I didn't need Pumas because there were no early tanks from them. Pumas vs several AT weapons is also a bad teching choice. Puma vs Kv8? Come on... They didn't have 2x fuel more often than us. But we weren't totally dominting as you pointed out. I had 17 stars of vet on my units compared to 11 and 13 on theirs when the ISU arrived. At this moment they held just 3 sector points, no fuel and 1 VP in the middle. This is at 21 minutes. In: Replays
Thread: Domination until ISU4 Jul 2014, 23:08 PM Please note the high veterancy on my units. I did not achieve this by playing badly. I outscored both soviet players by 30%. If anyone is in doubt about the ISU, take a look. Soviet player said "go and whine about it on the forum". I think it's not whining, it's a legitimate complaint. Absolute domination EDIT (have to concede it wasn't total domination. But still in control) vs 2 soviets until the ISU appears. Panther flank? Mines + 4 AT guns. Jagdpanzer? nonono... As OKW you either get good AT or good artillery, you can't have both. Vs 2x Soviets with their support teams, you can micro like a boss but once the ISU comes... Delete Delete Delete... Lower range has only meant Soviet players have learned to support the ISU a little. It is still a ridiculous unit. (For everyone complaining about the Jagd, take a look and see how feasible it is to build a Jagd even when you've had good map control) In: Replays
Thread: Volley Fire, from "I WIN" to "I LOSE"4 Jul 2014, 22:17 PM Agreed overnerfed In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The problems with OKW.4 Jul 2014, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2014, 19:51 PMKreatiir Its always funny how guys here dont read things but always go for the 'playercard says Sovjet? Ok you cant talk about balance' Sjeezes It's reaaheeally funny how you think that the playercard isn't a clear indicator of bias when the stats are: Soviets - 450 OKW - 3 I read what he said. He said: "Even though I use the ISU, which has been one of the biggest game-wreckers of all time, I accuse the Jagd of now spoiling my chumpish glee because I can no longer use my ISU to destroy EVERYTHING" I read what he said and I read his playercard. I found him and your whole allies-biased clan totally lacking. A bit of bias I would accept. But 450-3 nonononno, gtfo and stfu. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are they ever gonna fix Soviet?4 Jul 2014, 20:45 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2014, 19:39 PMPorygon QFT Using MG42 to stop flank is actually harder in higher level, Allies soldier just need to headon it in both edge of the cone, but ultra fast Maxim can just A move another maxim and stop the flank easily. +1 to Wooof and +1 to Porygon! Traverse speed makes the cone redundant. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: World of Jagdtiger Online4 Jul 2014, 20:18 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2014, 13:52 PMsomenbjorn Again, it is not about us not winning as much nor having a harder time winning, neither have any one of us stated that the Jagdtiger is not possible to counter. The problem is that it is a Boss unit and stuff like that need to go. Spent most of yesterday playing with it and it is a no brainer unit that takes a lot less skill to handle than other units. All this unit is doing is exactly like previous boss units, the ele in a way, the ISU and the un-patched TA, it grants a player not having good micro or tactics the ability to in an easy way beat somebody out of their skillrange, and that does not promote good playing. This I agree with! Tone them all the hell down I say. But start with ISU, not with Jagd. ISU is more of a no-brainer unit. At least Jagd can only kill Tanks. But yeah, tone them both down, I agree, no boss units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The problems with OKW.4 Jul 2014, 18:55 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2014, 18:17 PMwooof you must have missed their initial recruitment thread How does their declaration of playing only side mean that they can make comments on balance? Saying "We are totally biased" does not absolve you of being biased. He said he loved OKW. That's pure BS. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The problems with OKW.4 Jul 2014, 18:13 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2014, 12:10 PMAerohank I love the OKW. You don't have a solid all-round tank and vehicles are hard to come by. Units are specialized and you often have to improvise to deal with enemy threats if you don't have the right units on the field. It reminds me of playing Soviets without guards/shocks/call-in tanks back when the T34/76 was just battering ram on tracks. If you are the type of player that just likes to follow a build order that will work in any situation, than the OKW is not for you. You love OKW? Well you sure as hell don't play them much. 1v1 Oberkommando West - 3 games Soviets - 476 How can you even comment. Your whole clan is so ally-biased, I don't even know how to begin talking to you. You love OKW because t's easy to crush with your cookie-cutter soviet strategies. "If you are the type of player that just likes to follow a build order that will work in any situation, than the OKW is not for you" Your words and your reason for playing SOVIETSPAM all day every day. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU Post Patch4 Jul 2014, 18:07 PM Or give it more drawbacks. Like HE/AT change-over that takes some time (so it has to be used carefully) Longer reload Less squad wipe I don't care about it killing tanks if it just wouldn't destroy my carefully vetted infantry so fast! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: World of Jagdtiger Online4 Jul 2014, 13:31 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2014, 10:46 AMKreatiir Wow. This thread. We played enough 3v and 4v to know that its get massed 100 out of 101 times. Yes we play soviet, no we are not a couple of fanboys but simply want to address the problem that is now appearent in 3v and 4v. Its not about a counter or not,We really do know how to counter it. Its about the ability to mass that is absolutely not good for the gameplay. What you should do is play as OKW and see what other teams do to counter it. This will: A - give you some ideas on how to handle it B - give you some perspective on the problem. Maybe it's not the Jagdtiger at fault but you. Your 3v3/4v4 win-loss ratio as allies is high. This can mean 1 thing: Previously you were enjoying easy wins and now you are suffering defeats because of changes to the mechanics. This you claim is imbalance. To decide how right you are, we look to your perspective: The OP is a clan member and your favourite faction is Soviets and suddenly finding it less easy to win. Your perspective is skewed, your opinion is biased. Play more OKW. In: COH2 Balance