Profile of Bulgakov

Hey Pewpew Yeah, it's worth at least a few games. It's pretty fun now.

The picture of Tom on your avatar is exactly how I imagine your face every time anyone kills one of your units. "Ermahgerd, how dare you, omg OP!"


Stop getting so irate about everything. Every post you make is "GOD JUST LOOK AT THIS ABUSIVE SPAMMER GUY UGHHH GOD I HATE IT GAWWWDDD". It's like noise for my eyes every time you appear on the forum.


If you played as OKW more vs soviets you would see how easy it can be as Soviets to spam-blob and beat an OKW player. For every 1 player who complains that OKW > Sov there are 9 players complaining that Sov > OKW. What does this tell you?


Well done for spamming super tanks against the faction that cannot spam tanks and whose heaviest standard AT gun is a panzershrek on wheels.

plain and simple?

try owning as hard with soviets as you claim they own

That's a good point, any player saying that an army owns hard should posts replays of them owning with it. Like Barton and some other top players do, they prove it's true.


However I don't think this guy was saying it "owns hard". He's saying that the simplicity of the faction makes it boring and frustrating to play against.

Next time you run into 5 MGs with artillery-AT guns, think to yourself "Is this fun?"

... 35 games with western front. Maybe he should play a little more to talk about unit nerfs?
Rear echelon... wow such great utility that can be performed better by other units. I can give you rear and give me kubel ok ? or better sturm that are shredding infantry.
Im really sick of biased post on coh forums. Everytime when okw,werhmacht player loses game it is because OP units, first soviets now US are OP.
Im not best player but also i'm not blaming my loses on OP units.

A - Longjohn already pointed out that he has 100s of games. The player criticising him got the stats wrong.

B - People are not blaming their losses on these units. They are pointing out that certain units make the game less enjoyable to play/ A lot of players here who are complaining about units play BOTH sides. You should listen to that kind of player and ignore the biased people who play only one side. You can check this by looking at a player card.

What kind of games allow for 5 ISU anyway... lol.

You probably did something else wrong before.

I'll have to ask you to believe me that I didn't. I know it's possible I am making it up. I hope you will give me the benefit of the doubt

The reason it was possible to get 5 ISUs was because the game was a long stalemate slugfest. You can't walk into an ISU so you are forced to give them lots of time to field several each. He had no inf really so lots of popcap.

At point of ISU hitting field I had:
Sturmpio vet3
2x Volks vet3/4
2x Obersoldaten vet2
Panzer fusiliers vet4
Sturmoffizier
Inf gun vet 4
Panther vet1

Stolen Mortar
Stolen AT gun
Stolen Maxim

70% map control. I had lost no units and we had killed several full squads of theirs. (I have this replay I think. Unfortunately it's full of insults from both sides, so if someone wants to check, I can send it by PM, I'd rather not post it.)




Within 5 minutes 3 of those squads were wiped by the ISU. I flanked with Panther, got caught by mines, retreated panther and repaired, tried to flank again - New ISU appeared. Retreated Panther, got away, repaired (now vet2) waited for Sturmtiger, attacked with Panther from right sight, while attack with sturmtiger from the front. Panther died, Panzerfusiliers died trying to use AT grenade for engine crit, volks both died trying to use hreks - all one-shotted. I killed one ISU and his teammate had already built 2 more.