Profile of talarfon

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 74

General Information


Thread: CoH 2 Server Stress Test1 Jun 2013, 10:55 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Jun 2013, 10:49 AMMantley i think the last update is bugged, i played 2 mathces with soviets and after selecting the doctrine i wasnt able to produce shock troops or guards, after selecting them in the doctrine icon. it stayed with penals till the end of the game in the special rifle building sigh they are now a call in. Just click on the icon and then press where you want them to deploy to. Just like in COH1. In: Lobby
Thread: T34 dmg against Stug1 Jun 2013, 09:31 AM The main gun of that thing is awful against Infantry though. And the MG upgrades aren't as good as they were in COH1, don't seem to suppress as much, if at all? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T34 dmg against Stug31 May 2013, 16:38 PM Stugs are not spamable like they were in COH1 because their so much more expensive which means that they need to be more resilient to circle strafing than in the previous game. Or they would just get over-run almost all the time. Like DanielD said, they are strong as it is right now, making it able to quickly take out stugs and other armour will mean they have no weakness and could tackle any unit from T1-T2-T3-T4 as long as you have more pieces than your opponent which shouldn't be too hard considering they are about 70% the cost of an axis AT unit. The Stug is a pretty hard counter, as it should be. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T34 dmg against Stug31 May 2013, 13:38 PM haha, I just think it's a little early to be complaining about things that's all. And the priority in feedback should still be on things other than "stat tweaks". I was telling you what it does because you seem to have missed the purpose of the tank. It's not a tank killer and therefore you expect it to take a while to eliminate a well armored tank which the Stug is. Rear shots in general don't feel quite as powerful as COH1 to me but I don't know the exact figures or anything In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: T34 dmg against Stug31 May 2013, 12:04 PM Your not a happy chap are you, constantly complaining The T-34 is not an anti-tank tank, It's quite fast, mobile, good in numbers and against infantry. Their main gun is pretty underwhelming vs tanks, especially against at least decent armour which the Stug has. Didn't you start a thread stating how OP the t-34 was a few days ago?? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer balance29 May 2013, 19:22 PM An unlock within T3 which gives access to the T-34 tank. Reduce the cost of the T3 building slightly. I actually really like it as a unit but as it is, almost no situation you rather have it over it's bigger brother. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer balance29 May 2013, 13:54 PM Jump back to quoted post29 May 2013, 13:28 PMNullist Imo there is a serious problem with the following that nobody seems to be paying attention to. People, please consider the following: One unit has: -Oorah -Hit the Dirt -Merge -PPsh upgrade -AT Nades -Molotovs -Can build Sandbags -Vet ability -(and, latently, 6 models with which to recover weapons from the field) This is a patently ridiculous amount of abilities and upgrades. At the very least, Oorah and Hit the Dirt should be mutually exclusive. It's important for the conscripts to have upgrades and abillites though because that's how they scale into the late game and I actually really like having all those options. I do however of agree with the HTD ability though, feels a little off tbh, maybe a solution would be a slight lowering of DPS of the squad while it's active, because it's too easy to use aggressively right now in combination with Hoor-ah. And there isn't really too many drawbacks, sure your vulnerable to grenades but retreating is still an option... Lowering DPS would mean that it was used by units who were: -about to get suppressed -need to stay where they are (wait for reinforcements or to cap a point) -Trying to lengthen engagements for support units (snipers, mortars) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer balance29 May 2013, 08:05 AM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2013, 21:37 PMBartonPL let's don't talk about balance because Relic don't care about it atm because they are focusing on other stuff right now, balance is the last thing that they want to do (probably in Open Beta) yup, but it's always nice to have a bit of a whine I haven't had too many problems with this "super fast, cheap, kills everything, no counter" T34 people are talking about though.... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer balance28 May 2013, 17:05 PM I agree that overall the Gren is probably a better unit right now, but the fact that their weapon upgrades are completely nullified on the move can make your army very static and vulnerable to indirect fire and unable to move up and kill exposed units. BUT my main point is that there is too much of a window for your opponent to get a t-70 or t-34 without you having any solid AT at all, and you will likely get pushed off the map somewhat and if you lose your fuel and you were banking on T3 units then your f*****d really. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer balance28 May 2013, 15:34 PM Jump back to quoted post28 May 2013, 15:01 PMPorygon T2 is useless now Pgrens dominate against conscript spam, especially if they haven't gone the HTD doctrine. Also all the options in T3 are very fuel expensive making it hard to trasition T1-T3 and actually have enough fuel to produce units consistently. No way is it useless. In: COH2 Balance