Profile of talarfon

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 74

General Information


Thread: Guards Rifle; The 'SU-85' of Infantry?28 Jul 2013, 17:12 PM They are fine.... They will not force off vehicles on their own and pgrens do beat them quite easily with no nades from either side... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: build order.11 Jul 2013, 22:44 PM AT nades don't need to be incoperated into a build as their research time is short enough for it to be a reactionary step. Also getting it after only 3 conscripts will be completely pointless 95% of the time. Just a waste of manpower and fuel which could be used to either get molotvs, another engi or healing.... In: Red Army Strategies
Thread: Bring back random choice27 Jun 2013, 15:17 PM I'm talking about the faction choice, you can no longer choose "random" but are fixed to a certain faction. Personally I don't really care which faction I am, and would much rather have a faster match found which surely this function would achieve? In: Lobby
Thread: Bulletins...22 Jun 2013, 14:26 PM I would prefer if you could only pick up to one from each category, because why would anyone not go for the conscripts/grenadiers ones? Maybe increase the bulletins used to 5 to compensate for some of the crappy ones. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Sovs == Brits22 Jun 2013, 14:23 PM can lay demos? secret ability? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: HTD needs to go22 Jun 2013, 14:21 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Jun 2013, 14:11 PMShazz I can push them back sometimes with bundle nades, maybe a lucky rifle nade, but there aren't enough munitions to counter the constant HTD and a really good player can still dodge them. Ermmm how can a really good player dodge them?? By retreating? Surely that means you get map control? I do agree it's strong however, IMO a change should be made so that damage output is reduced while ability is active to something like x0.75 damage dealt which would mean that it's not so powerful when used with hoorah to close the distance. End of the day though, that doctrine is very "meh" apart from PPSH and HTD for conscripts, no super tank which means that Ost T3 can be very very tough to deal with so it does have to be strong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 5 things that are destroying balance right now13 Jun 2013, 10:40 AM Yeah conscripts with HTD and PPSH are powerful but remember that's all that commander really gives you, no late game powerful armor which means that if you tech up you will have the edge. I do sort of agree with your point on conscript vet, and all vet in general infact. Meat shields get vet faster than damage dealing units, this isn't right. Give experience from damage taken only 10-20% of experience you'd get if you dealt the damage it would mean that units don't automatically becoming vet 3 if they survive 20 mins into the game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfaust vs AT nade9 Jun 2013, 22:24 PM I smell clown cars running riot In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panzerfaust vs AT nade9 Jun 2013, 16:42 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2013, 16:39 PMBartonPL Both things are lame, only usefull when you want to slow other tank, but it deals no damage. Hee's what i think should be done - Panzerfaust damage 1.5 or 1.75 to AT nade (for example, AT nade deals 100 damage so fanzerfaust will deal 150/175 damage) - Remove any kind of engine damages from panzerfaust - Panzerfaust should have lesser range than AT nade And now look at this, panzerfaust finally deals some damage and it's worth using it, AT nade is only to slow down german tanks It's like Panzerfaust and Stickies in Coh1 which is a good idea IMO, that's how these weapons should look like +1 -Though I see no reason why faust range should be smaller? -Also they still should give a damaged engine to light vehicles (i.e clown car) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Halftracks/Clown Cars + Flamethrowers9 Jun 2013, 12:48 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jun 2013, 04:07 AMStephennJF Yeah I don't like this style of play much either, a little bit tasteless in my opinion. My conclusion of what to blame in this circumstance is the illogical reasoning as to why they removed the CoH1 mines which each lay for 25 ammo. Yep, no reason to remove the current mines, just add a 25 muni mine for each faction, effective at taking out light vehicles (heavy damage crit?) and ok vs infantry. The current mine for soviets would probably be needed to be made 40-45 muni and damage increased accordingly so it can be effective late game vs tanks Another thing I don't really like is that mines don't seem to suppress troops like Vcoh which means they aren't as good at dealing with flanks, which is surely one of the main reasons for mines?! At the moment there is no justification in early mines, even on these maps which are pretty choke heavy!! Maybe they felt they needed to decrease the effectivness of mines due to the style of maps in the new game? I don't know.... In: COH2 Balance