Hi
I played two fun auto-matched 2 v 2s yesterday, won one and lost one.
I lost as USF and won as OKW, both games were four faction games (i.e. mixed teams).
Here's the thing - I felt the games were well-balanced in terms of player skill (I'm out there in the not-very-skilled majority) but I played better in the game I lost (i.e. USF).
Why?
I think it's pop cap. The OKW player (including me) has such epic resilience and can shrug off poor map control (on Semoisky I had 75% control) and those 'great come backs' mean for many of us 'just hang on long enough to get supertank).
I did this myself, the T34 call-in armada I was facing was crushed by a KT and a panther, not to mention my shrek legion.
Am prepared to accept L2P allegations because, as I say, I'm not the most skilled player but am enjoying 2 v 2. But when I *win* and wonder how I did it I have to ask myself if the pop cap issue is skewing outcomes disproportionately.
Oh, and if Vetlolcake is reading this, I faced upwards of eight HMG teams backed up with At guns and mortars - I stuka'd them and used, you know, micro.
It is a reality that USA pop cap can be exploited with armor decrew but I have the feeling that Okw units pop is low compared to werhmacht faction and that means that more okw squads can be fielded.