Profile of T.R. Stormjäger

Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2020, 13:03 PMLeo251

Why is Relic taking so long to fix OP units like this. I will never get it.

Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2020, 12:51 PMWiderstreit

All over, removing auto-fire is easiest way to fix them, I think. (same for leIG18) Maybe Relic can be convinced, because why not? Balancing became community-work.

Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2020, 22:21 PMKronosaur0s

I dont know man, but if skilled people like Terror, Olvadi, CN, and even Seeking (he said it in a streaming) and a lot of people who would post it anyways after me right now, say Valentine its too good, maybe.... they're right you know?

Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2020, 19:33 PMKatitof

Another thing is, while Ostwind became murdermachine to the point where it had to had put a limit on affected entities, Centaur was getting nerf after nerf, falling to the level of performance in AI comparable to Cromwell at times and its low speed isn't helping the unit either, its higher armor over ostwind, ironically, helps exclusively against med generalist tanks.

Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2020, 15:16 PMSander93

Changing a unit's role or place within the roster (timing etc.) and adjusting the cost and the performance accordingly is a perfectly good way to make units or abilities more distinct or useful, rather than just outright buffing or nerfing them. It has been done quite a bit in the past with units like Assault Engineers or Panzerfusiliers. And for example in hindsight I wonder if it wouldn't have been better to "nerf" the Ostwind into a cheaper intermediate anti-light vehicle that might've really helped Ostheer against LVs, rather than buffing its performance into a 100 fuel AI vehicle.

Not that I really agree that the Centaur needs this. I think it's fine currently and that it's actually the Cromwell that could probably use a 10 fuel increase with its new AI performance to help make the Centaur stand out a bit more. Definitely not a priority.