I think an argument should be able to stand on its merit regardless of the skill of the individual, though that skill level can support the validity of an argument indirectly as it shows the person has(sometimes superior) knowledge to potentially come to a sound conclusion.
In this case though, I don't find the OP's arguments compelling and his rank is kinda poor for him to have super secret special techniques or know-how to offset this.
I don’t disagree, but the thing is when you’re a terribly ranked usf player who keeps making balance threads every week to bitch about the game cannot disallow and invalidate the opinions of other players who have significantly higher ranks than him, thus alluding to significantly more skill and thus better balance opinions, on the basis of them having some kind of positive bias towards Axis factions just because they don’t agree with his absurd opinions on why Allies need a buff to every unit.
Tldr: just cause I don’t agree with this shit player doesn’t mean I can’t have a valid opinion. “hE’S aXIS fANBOI dON’T lISTEN” isn’t an argument,