Profile of Geblobt

Jump back to quoted post14 Oct 2021, 16:27 PMHannibal

What keeps the JP4 "bad" is not its performance, but its timing within the faction. Either you don't need it (P4 is better at fighting Allied mediums as well as makes up for more and more upgraded Allied infantry around the 15 min mark) or you don't want it later on because P4 and JP4 do not synergize as well.

Jump back to quoted post29 Sep 2021, 20:26 PMProtos Angelus

JP4 is by far the best TD in the game. Insanely good ROF. Insanely survivable. Penetration is decent enough to warrant pens on pretty much all stock tanks. Even when it goes against heavy tanks, the ROF is enough to warrant a couple of pens.

It's been OP for a long time. Nobody talked about it because the Jackson has been the main thorn in OST players regarding TDs. But in teamgames, on lane-y maps, Jackson doesn't hold a candle to JP4.

Pretty much every thread was filled with whataboutisms and so nobody talked about JP4

Jump back to quoted post25 Sep 2021, 18:23 PMMr Carmine

Dont go and point the finger at others.

You are not showing all context. The p4 is a generalist medium. The jackson is hard at, the excact purpose of the jackson is to hard counter armour such as the p4. The p4 fills multyple roles, the jackson fills only 1.

The p4 has no need nor justification to 100% pen its hard counter on hit at max range. Yet it can now because of reasons.

You would support a t34/stug change to pen the stug 100% at max range? They are simaler in price after all. Also no one bats an eye that the t34 cant.

Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2021, 00:02 AMKurobane

USF just needs the third weapon rack (M1919) to be available non doctrinally.