Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Do you think cons deserve some nondoc AI upgrade ? 29 Mar 2019, 01:55 AM I loved Tric's idea. Pls make it happen In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: HOW ABOUT GIVE ALL UKF EMPLACEMENTS SCUTTLE29 Mar 2019, 01:43 AM I think to begin with, mortar emplacements should do better against other mortars. Otherwise any emplacement is but utterly doomed to indirect fire. Later, emplacement cancer is real, its passive gameplay and its not funny at all, to solve that a tradeoff must be made. Sometimes the hardest part of defense is the logistic part. Either being resourse income decreased or supply trucks being delivered constantly to bofors / 17 pounders to work properly could be added alongside buffs In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New OKW commander role overlap29 Mar 2019, 01:39 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2019, 01:33 AMborobadger Only if they give PPSHs to cons as stock. Sry, argument? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht Early Game Struggle29 Mar 2019, 01:35 AM Stugs overnerf is real. Sadly In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer - Strategic Reserve Doctrine Forward Supply Station.29 Mar 2019, 01:27 AM I agree In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New OKW commander role overlap29 Mar 2019, 01:25 AM +1 In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: HOW ABOUT GIVE ALL UKF EMPLACEMENTS SCUTTLE29 Mar 2019, 01:24 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2019, 22:34 PMGrim Unless mortars and AT guns are only for the early game then the build order should be unaffected unless the player had no idea they were facing the UKF and made no effort to build mortars? I get what you mean, but i think the point is how drastic the change in build order becomes. Normally anyone would get an ATG at some time in early-midgame point, but if the game was particularly hard for axis or mistakes were made, it tightens the build order into really awkward positions, maybe unflexible enough to force a loose. I think thats fair, but a little bit overseen. Good play for UKF should promote continuous advantage rather than a 1-2 punch to kill axis mobility. Same is said to OKM that they push way too hard into the enemy build orders and strategies and ask for nerfs. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: HOW ABOUT GIVE ALL UKF EMPLACEMENTS SCUTTLE29 Mar 2019, 01:20 AM Someone wanted to buff emplacements. But he forgot how currently they are used as assault options, on unspotted places. Aggressive bofors tend to ruin all early/midgame until PAKS or Pumas come into play, and after that if mortars/ATG are present, bofors are almost godlike. If emplacements are meant to be defensive, then buff them in exange double build time cost. It will be harder to destroy (a defensive buff) at the cost of removing such cheesy plays In: COH2 Balance
Thread: mayby why axis is popular29 Mar 2019, 01:01 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2019, 16:56 PMmons7erz Axis: puts MG on one side of the map Well, Guess thats covered for the next 5 minutes. Laughable. UKF: *builds bofors on cutoff/ fuel point. "Ez 20 min map control, GGWP" (A lot of micro involved too) In: Lobby
Thread: Revamp Volksgrenadiers terms of versatility OKW28 Mar 2019, 04:34 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Mar 2019, 19:56 PMinsaneHoshi You can't do anything more because it's bad. Its like saying cons arnt bad, youre just using them in combat roles which isnt its role. cons were never a combat troop /s *raging katitof appears In: COH2 Balance