Profile of mr.matrix300

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 518

General Information
Register Time: 15 Feb 2018, 21:30 PM
Last Visit Time: 18 Jul 2022, 16:23 PM

Signature

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

Playing with randoms

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

18 Aug 2020, 04:11 AMCODGUY

I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.

18 Aug 2020, 04:14 AMCODGUY

The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not

2 Jun 2018, 04:21 AMRocket

Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.

29 Jun 2020, 19:21 PMIncendiaryRounds

u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.

12 Aug 2020, 10:02 AMProtos Angelus

Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.

12 Aug 2020, 12:59 PMKatitof

I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Why is the Jagdtiger so pointless10 Aug 2020, 17:49 PM It costs 245 fuel and 720 MP, is basically useless against infantry, the schwere panzer upgrade is required to call it in ( and it needs to be alive ) , it seems to miss a lot of shots, it is slow, it requires spotting, and it can get into trouble when 2 allied TDs engage it frontally ( or when one T 34 rams it ... ) So what is the point of this ... thing ? Why not just get 2 JP 4 instead ? They seem to be better than the Jagdtiger in almost every way while being of far lower risk. Even when the enemy has a ISU 152 it is better to just get 2 JP4s to counter the ISU , as ISU doctrines come with Il2 bombing runs ... If it could be called in even when the schwere HQ is destroyed then I would at least see a point in it, but at the moment it is just one big heavy lie. People tell you it is good to counter allied Tanks / TDs , but once you get it it is just a big waste of fuel. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: State of OKW in the meta 10 Aug 2020, 12:37 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Aug 2020, 12:03 PMKatitof You can get less spios then other engies, but 2 spios will outperform 3 other faction engies for similar cost at everything they do. 2 Spios = 600 MP and 16 Pop Cap, 30 MP / model to reinforce 3 Russian Pios = 510 MP and 15 Pop Cap, 21 MP / model to reinforce 3 US Pios = 600 MP and 15 Pop Cap, 25 MP / model to reinforce 3 UKF Pios = 630 MP and 15 Pop Cap, 26 MP / model to reinforce, can be upgraded to repair just as fast as OKW Pioneers ( so you only need to spend 420 MP ) , also they do stay on the field after LVs arrive ... unlike Sturmpios ( at least you claimed that ) Also: Will they really outperform them at everything ? As far as I am aware more=better when it comes to minesweepers. ( And they don't come with non doc flamethrowers, the ability to build bunkers, the ability to build cachees ) And do USF and SU really need to be on par when it comes to repair speed? USF has crew repair and SU has quite a few docs that allow Cons to repair tanks In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 10 Aug 2020, 11:55 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2020, 21:54 PMCODGUY The doctrine is pretty meh even though it's filled to the brim with all this crap. Still gets chosen by top 100 players so maybe it is not that "meh" Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2020, 21:54 PMCODGUY The WC51 is the best part of the doctrine though because for a faction with no early game advantages it's nice to have a T0 unit that can do certain things not possible in any other doctine No earlygame advantages ? Riflemen beat Volks, Grens and even Sturmpioneers. Tell me more about no earlygame advantages Jump back to quoted post9 Aug 2020, 21:54 PMCODGUY The WC51 is the best part of the doctrine Probably. But it is by far not the only useful / strong part of this doctrine In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What is the point of the Mobile Defence Puma?9 Aug 2020, 15:37 PM Quite some time ago it was supposed to counter T 70 or other LVs and I assume it still is ?!? But I somehow can never manage to get 5 CPs by the time the enemy fields a T 70 / other LV. And apparently it i am not alone with this. Even top players seem to have only 3-4 CPs 10 minutes into the game. So what is the point of the Puma then? In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 9 Aug 2020, 13:25 PM (To all those claiming that this doctrine is bad) A bit OT but also commander and WC 51 related. The 76 mm Sherman seems to be quite potent. Even though it only costs 5 fuel more than OST Pz 4 it is able to beat one without any problems ( even against OKW Pz 4 for OST it can be a even fight). Once vetet up it can even face Panthers while being better at AI than Panther ( and ofc better at AI than Jackson ). Now remember that the WC 51 provides this doctrine with a "Mark the Target" ability and reconsider if it is really that bad in late game or if the WC 51 really needs this ability. Also: Cavalry Riflemen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet vs Wehr 2 vs 2 Lots of Pios and Zis 39 Aug 2020, 07:32 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Aug 2020, 21:54 PMYRon²y ... Thank you very much. Will definitely focus on some of these points more in future games. In: Replays
Thread: What could we have done different in order to win?8 Aug 2020, 20:46 PM So I know it might seem like a noob question or situation but my mate and I got beaten in 2 vs 2 even though one of the enemy team was just spamming pioneers and supportweapons. He did not get a single Tank except an T 70. He basically just got lots of Zis 3 and mortars. Killing them off with infantry was no option, as the mortars were hitting our infantry hard( also he had lots of pioneers with flamethrowers) . Charging in with a Tank was also no option due to the many Zis 3 guns. And mortars would also have been no option because they would have been outgunned. In retrospect I maybe should have went for a mortar HT, but I couldn't do , as I choose my doctrine before the Support weapon spam came apparent. I went for Panzerwerfers, as they are usually nice when it comes to dealing with support weapons spam, but this meant, that the enemy could field more tanks. I really need some help regarding this replay / strats like this in general, as I have faced strats like these a few times before ( even by rank 500 to 700 players ( 2 vs 2 ) and struggled against them Replay In: Replay Reviews
Thread: Soviet vs Wehr 2 vs 2 Lots of Pios and Zis 38 Aug 2020, 20:45 PM I really need some help regarding this replay / strats like this in general, as I have faced strats like these ( Pios + Support spam ) a few times before ( even by rank 500 to 700 players ( 2 vs 2 ) and struggled against them In: Replays
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 5 Aug 2020, 04:47 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2020, 15:28 PMGoldenpunch its not one shot planes with M2HB. Just damage. A single WC 51 can shoot down a 60 ammo recon plane in about 30 seconds (without the player doing anything ). The 35 Ammo recon plane can even be shot down instantly by double WC 51 ( and can be shot down by a single WC 51 if used correctly / lucky and with Vet. ) Jump back to quoted post4 Aug 2020, 15:28 PMGoldenpunch Remember you can double faust it and its dead Remember the WC 51 has wheels and can move. Also: Spending 50 Ammo and some Manpower ( you will lose some models when charging it ) to kill a 200 MP and 45 Ammo unit isn't exactly what I would consider a great deal In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Is the WC 51 overperforming ? 4 Aug 2020, 11:51 AM I can't help but feel, that this unit, which costs 200 MP ( less than a Kubel and on top of that no fuel ) is overperforming. I mean sure ... you need to pay 45 ammo to upgrade it with an MG, but you can transport troops with it (even when upgraded) , you can mark vehicles with it, you can call arty with it in and it can even repair itself ( by that I mean the crew can repair it ) and it can capture points. Just compare this to the other equivalents of the WC 51. Kubel: non doctrinal, Costs a bit more MP, can also cap points, can not transport any troops and overall sucks against infantry, let alone light vehicles. Gets slaughtered by WC 51 UC: non doctrinal, can repair itself ( for ammo ), Can transport troops when without upgrade, is decent against infantry, more MP and Ammo needed, can not cap points, more time passes till it can be upgraded OKW 221: doctrinal, can not cap points, Needs fuel, can repair itself ( for ammo ), okish against infantry, has some useful abilities ( of which one you will probably never use as it need vet 5 for it ) , can obv. not transport infantry, no ammo needed. Will get beaten by WC 51 In my opinion the WC 51s MG should deal far less damage. Especailly against light vehicles like the OKWs 221 or the 251. Even without a great MG it still has much to offer. One thing that is also worth mentioning imo is that the UC got nerfed and its upgrades stuck behind T1 because it was too good. So why doesn't the same apply to the WC 51? Why isn't it considered too good. After all it gets its Upgrade earlier than the UC ( and even earlier than the old UC) and even has more and better abilities than the UC ( flamethrower left aside ) In: COH2 Balance