Profile of flyingpancake

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 186 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Sander's personal balance changes24 Oct 2020, 12:45 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2020, 12:39 PMVipper power creep The PPSH upgrade is worse compared to the SVT upgrade that cost the same muni, and worse compared to the 7 man upgrade that cost 10 muni less. If these 2 upgrades are balanced in you opinion (they are in mine) then the PPSH upgrade is underperforming or too expensive for what it does. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes24 Oct 2020, 12:21 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2020, 12:15 PMAarotron i mean at that point i'd much rather build shocks Conscripts have advantages over shocks in the way of building, manpower and popcap cost. Saying that you rather get one unit over the other is not a good reason to keep a current ability that occupies a whole ability slot suboptimal. Besides there is more instances of cheaper line assault infantry and elite assault infantry (cav rifles and rangers for example) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes24 Oct 2020, 11:57 AM Can the Conscript PPSH assault package be looked at? It kinda lackluster as an upgrade and kinda expensive as a side grade. I would prepose 1 of 2 things: 1. change the muni cost to 45 for the 3 PPSH. 2. Give 6 PPSH instead of 3 for 60 muni. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes22 Oct 2020, 13:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2020, 12:48 PMJibberJabberJobber Mechanized Grenadier Group replaced with Mechanized Assault Group. Panzergrenadiers can be upgraded with the Support Package from Infantry Doctrine (this addition does not apply to Mechanized Assault) The Grenadier 250 as it is in the doctrine currently is too situational, despite the recent cost decrease. The 250 works with Mechanized Assault, because you're constantly applying pressure from the start of the game and the 250 works with Infantry Doctrine, because the timing is much earlier. With normal Grenadier builds, you want to be investing in more impactful units like the 222 or Panzergrenadiers, instead of investing in a (probably) 4th Grenadier squad with a fragile halftrack. Replacing the Grenadier inside with a Panzergrenadier would give it more impact. Allowing Panzergrenadiers to upgrade with the Support Package would thematically fit well and might make an underrated ability see more use. Too be honest i am personally not a fan of halftrack call ins with infantry in them (lendlease assault guards is another example). This goes 2x for OST IMO since getting a medium out quickly is important to OST pressure. I would propose that it becomes an empty haltrack just like in OST infantry doctrine so the player can decide what infantry they want in it and it wont have the super high purchasing price. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Theories about penals21 Oct 2020, 14:48 PM Who cares about who has what to prove. You guys argue like a married couple so it needs to get settled in a best of 3 1v1. In: Lobby
Thread: Theories about penals21 Oct 2020, 14:08 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2020, 14:02 PMGrining Cat Vipper vs. Katiof best of five when? +1 In: Lobby
Thread: Rifle Company Should have the M191918 Oct 2020, 12:45 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Oct 2020, 12:15 PMKatitof Ok then, now riddle me this: Why have a doctrinal upgrade that is significantly WEAKER then stock option when the stock option is also extremely early game? Dual BARs are much stronger then para carbines and rifles do not have any survivability issues due to their vet. Well one could say it could work like a global upgrade at that all rifleman get elite carbines while still retaining their 2 weapon slots. I dont necesarily agree with the idea but it could work something like that. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2v2 crossing in the woods17 Oct 2020, 19:36 PM Team 1 Soviet: flyingpancake Brit: sidewinder1911 Team 2 OKW: cblanco ★ OKW: SoE_CrossFire In: Replays
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes17 Oct 2020, 17:37 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Oct 2020, 17:27 PMKatitof Explain to me how tank with worst penetration on long range would be used as stationary object? The ability makes sense for KV-1 because it takes fuckload of punishment. Also, if what you say was anything else then cocaine dream, we would see that used with P4s as ost already has access to this since forever. T34 76 has no higher pen then a KV1 so this argument is meaningless. The highest value you get out of the KV1 hulldown is the rate of fire increase, same would go for the t34's. The OST hulldown is not comparable because you need infantry to apply the ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sander's personal balance changes17 Oct 2020, 17:16 PM What about replacing the t34(and 85) ram with a different abilty? Like for example hulldown like the KV1 has. Soviets would dig in their tanks often. In: COH2 Balance