Profile of flyingpancake

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 186 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: WEHRMACHT COMMANDER REVAMP DISCUSSION26 Aug 2018, 14:28 PM Hinterhaltung doctrine: Assault Grenadiers 0CP Ambush camouflage (works on assault grenadier too) 1CP Spotting Scopes 5Cp Pak 43 Emplacement 8Cp Stuka bombing Strike (the neutralizing one) 12CP A doctrine designed around controlling the pace of the battle with units that can take initiative or take initiative away from your enemy. Also, it makes a new commander with the assault grenadiers. I would like to see more of them. Speaking of Assault Grenadiers. Mechanized Assault Doctrine (Rework): Assault Grenadiers 0CP Sd.Kfz. 251 Mortar halftrack 3CP Stuka reconnaissance overflight 4CP StuG 3 E Assault Gun 5CP (current one comes out too late and your better off getting a Ostwind at that point) Stuka Close Anti Tank Strafe 10Cp I think the Mechanized Assault doctrine has too much call ins and redundant abilities at this moment. The Panzer Grenadier call in is too expensive for what is and the tiger doesn't seem to synergies with the heavy early presence and overall playstyle this doc forces you in too. The light arty is fine if a bit bland. That's why I propose these changes. In: Lobby
Thread: Switching axis secondary weapons of support squads28 Dec 2017, 14:42 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Dec 2017, 06:55 AMd0ggY "support squads would gain more benefit from a close range smg incase they get flanked. " Well a mg42 can be flanked too. But i think it is fine how it is, for me it would be more of a just aesthetic thing to do, the MG support member are not like very heavy affecting the kills a mg gets Well my point is that with the aggressive all or nothing playstyle of OKW this might be more likely to happen. And as you put it it doesn't really matter that mutch indeed. so why not switch it around for aestetic reasons? It shouldn't´t be that hard to change, give the OKW support weapon teams the "volksgrenadier MP40" and give the Ostheer weaponteams the "Ostruppen Kar98k" so they wont start overperforming and sniping models left and right. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Switching axis secondary weapons of support squads28 Dec 2017, 03:23 AM I am usually not the one to post on forums but I have had this idea for a while and I am wondering what others think of it. I propose to switch the secondary weapons of the axis support squads. I have two reasons for this proposal, practical and aesthetic. Practical Ostheer support squads get MP40's as secondary's while OKW support squads get Kar98k's. This seems counterproductive to me because the Ostheer infantry style seems to be centered around keeping infantry at long range where they can make the most of there high accuracy and support weapon synergy. This goes double for the MG42 because it usually suppresses fast and this will result in infantry being at longer range it would just make more sense for them in terms of gameplay synergy to have Kar98k's. OKW in contrast to me seems more focused around aggression and mobility therefore the support squads would gain more benefit from a close range smg incase they get flanked. Aesthetic OKW with there late war volksgrenadiers seem in my eyes better suited to to have large amount of automatic weapons with there weaponteams because like one of the in game bulletins describes the volksgrenadiers where given a higher amount of automatic weaponry to compensate for there lack of man power. As for Ostheer, earlier in the war MP40's weren't nearly as wide spread as later in the war. I think would therefore look better and make more sense to give the Ostheer support squads Kar98k's I understand these things came to be over years of game development and it works well as it is now but I do still think my idea hold ground. I don't know how hard it would be to implement these changes in a patch but since a lot of things are being changed lately it doesn't seems too extreme. Please do tell me what you guys think. In: COH2 Gameplay