Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: Soviet September patch discussion30 Aug 2019, 08:22 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 21:24 PMStug life hey guys what if SU started with a cons and an eng squad ? or what if first cons squad was free of mp ? would it bee too op ? it would unnecessarily buff T1... making soviet T1 anymore powerful is unacceptable... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Maxim redesign redirect thread30 Aug 2019, 08:19 AM ppl should really think of it in this way.... if conscripts are not meant to do damage... and so arent maxims... and mortars were nerfed soo hard that they cant do it anyways... then how the hell do you propose soviet T2 to deal any sort of damage whatsoever? sov T2 remains the least viable build ingame for that reason alone... (even worse than ost) it simply cant deal damage In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther armor rebalance.30 Aug 2019, 02:12 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 15:08 PMmrgame2 This is different today. Allies got TD with range, good vet bonus on pen and damages. theyve always had good range and good vet... and as kat said arguably the old SU-85 vet was superior because it made its ROF insanely fast Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 15:08 PMmrgame2 Allies have access to snares. and all axis mainlines have access to fausts... what are you crying about? Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 15:08 PMmrgame2 Panther rear armor got nerfed. even a T-34-76 used to penetrate panthers in the rear... Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 15:08 PMmrgame2 Axis heavies got nerfed. i mean the KT is no longer the i win button it was a few years ago... that definitely isnt a bad thing... Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 15:08 PMmrgame2 Allies heavies have stronger rear armor. and this is a problem why? Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 15:08 PMmrgame2 The tactics is different about soaking damage and high front armor. Hence this thread is opened to rebalance panther to suit todays meta. l2p In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion29 Aug 2019, 12:28 PM T1 is still far more prevalent in tournaments though... which indicates that it is the preferred and possibly more viable way of playing soviets..... and sort of indicates how T2 is uncompetitive against T1 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther armor rebalance.29 Aug 2019, 12:01 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 11:10 AMJilet Man are you delusional ? I said I would pick the range and speed over armor and hp. Because that is how every single RTS game work. Mobility and range are kings in those games. Why in AoE2 was Longbow or Eagle Warriors notorious and Teutonic Knight was a nono ? The same reason. The vehichles you are talking about are not even in the games time period and I really didn't get what you want to say. Yes the panther is good agreed but it can't dive allied TDs freely except for lonely SU-85. the comparison isnt fair with the argument going as follows 1. a claim that a 60 range cheap TD locking down all your nondoc armor is a l2p issue 2. you implied that the JT/ele with its superior range locking down allied TDs is an equally valid analogy and l2p issue but disregarding 1. the allies dont have that speedy premium medium i mentioned awhile ago capable of tanking hits from a JT/ELE like a panther can against an SU/FF/jackson 2. the fact that this premium medium also has AI capabilities which if not kept in check by the TD can deal significant damage to infantry but then counteracted by stating " I said I would pick the range and speed over armor and hp" which then disregards 3. the panther is faster than both the FF and SU-85 while being more armored aswell... the only real advantage of the aforementioned TDs is range as for the jackson yeah it should prolly cost 155 fuel with the FF being 140-145 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW September patch discussion29 Aug 2019, 11:49 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 11:30 AMStug life guys guys , fuck history it's a game tank didn't have 60 meter range at max IRL, nor did people survive point black nades agreed... hence i stated in the end that historical accuracy doesnt dictate balance... but i also wanted to disprove the BS concerning the so called "historical accuracy" that misses the mark soo hard it couldnt hit a barn 1cm away... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther armor rebalance.29 Aug 2019, 10:49 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Aug 2019, 09:49 AMJilet I would prefer mobility with range to all other stats. If you can't shoot you he can have all the armor he wants. And yes the comparison is quite fair. soo can we buff say the comet to have 10 less range than the JT/ele and give it much more HP armor and mobility than the JP/ele and call it a centurion? can we also do the same for the T-34-85, call it a T-44-100 and make it nondoctrinal? and of course the M48 patton for the USA... and made nondoctrinal? id bet that would be completely fair lmao In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Panther armor rebalance.29 Aug 2019, 02:35 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Aug 2019, 21:18 PMJilet It does for the OKW tho since their stupid Raketen is outranged by every single ATG and TD of allies. Think before writing. And if I am forced to build Jagtiger every single game to counter allied TDs then make it non-doc eh ? So we can say the same thing to allies players "If only 1 heavy ass 85 range tank" is enough to shut all your armor you have some serious learning of play to do.. this comparison isnt fair since the allies dont get a heavy medium/tank hunter with high mobility decent AI DPS with the pintle mg and the armor/durability to 1v1 the aforementioned TD so long as both are in range... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What the new balance patch got wrong?28 Aug 2019, 01:51 AM That explains the spectacular soviet winrate pre penal buff doesnt it? When the soviets had no viable infantry whatsoever? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What the new balance patch got wrong?27 Aug 2019, 22:11 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Aug 2019, 21:09 PMmondeogaming1 I think t70 is super strong The T70 doesnt fix the retarded infantry ptoblem In: COH2 Balance