Profile of Rosbone

In general though I agree with OP that it is a decent map. I also belive people complain way too much about maps in this community.

One thought is:
Most people like to play a certain build every time. It is the meta for them and is the strongest they can be. Some maps force you out of your comfort zone and you have to come up with a different build order. If you really care about your rank you get pissed because you lose a game or two trying out different builds until you find the one that works for that map. So its all open rural maps from now on. Get used to it

That said, Westwall seems to be large enough to flank and open enough so the CQC units are not OP. So I would assume players would like those aspects.

Maybe it is too open? And it has a stigma attached from the cutoff buildings? The high importance of the cutoffs would also force a lot of action in the middle VP, which would also be good for snipers. Less flanking and plenty of targets?

Yes i full agree. I can't tell you anymore why I did not changed it in DBP with all the other changes. I just can guess I was thinking it is too much to change the hills.(from scope).

But this time def. this will get in. Its super unfair to south side. So let's see how much we can get rid of this hill situation.

Awesome! It takes about 25 seconds with the HEIGHT editor set to SMOOTH.

Getting Angoville to be balanced would require drastic changes. Like:
- Remove stone wall above south base. Or mirror it on North.
- Remove/Reposition some buildings.
- The left VP is closer to South.
- South cutoff has a building on it.
- VPs should be repositioned across middle of the map.
- Better bunker placement in bases.
- North has to cross RED cover to exit base area.

The south spawn with MGs in city could get two VPs and the third VP is closer as well. South spawn favoured.

I am a fan of Crossroads, but this giant mound has to go FFS. How is this even a thing?

At first glance there seemed to be some imbalance around the wooden VP buildings. However, they are very close in design. The main difference being the large log piles (RED) utility vs the sight blocking bushes (RED).
- The EAST VP logs may give you safer LV retreat options mid game.
- The WEST VP bushes may be easier to get close to an MG and toss a grenade or even flame it thru the hedgerow.
- The EAST VP house has additional green cover hay mounds outside of it allowing for another flanking option.
- The WEST VP has arguably better yellow cover.



There is a slight imbalance with the wooden houses over looking the fuels. Again, nothing major and may not warrant any change.
- The EAST FUEL has much closer sight blockers giving an approaching squad a better chance of getting into grenade range before an MG could target them. And sight blockers 2 and 3 are on the corner of the building which would require an MG to change position to target an approaching squad.
- The distances to these buildings from each base is close (approx 212M), however, the SOUTH team must venture closer to the EAST VP building to get to their house. Bypassing the house sight radius puts the EAST house much further away. So mid game an MG in the EAST VP house would make the EAST fuel harder to contest and also have a slightly more dangerous RETREAT PATH. You could be closer to the house and on RED cover for a longer period of time.