Profile of Bizrock

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 206

General Information


Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]22 Sep 2017, 22:37 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2017, 22:21 PMVipper I made no such claim, I simply pointed out Ostheer is one of the most munition hungry faction, imo much more than USF. Imo loitering planes generally need an overhaul. Planes should have HP and not die from critical and they should also be worth calling but not without counters. An idea for that would be to harder to shoot down, have a small sight radius so that fire but suffer "suppression style" affect when fired upon. Just a price reduction would be great. Like 180. Is that hard to do? Or even better, have the same chance to crit engine and stun like Stuka. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]22 Sep 2017, 22:08 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2017, 21:16 PMVipper Ostheer are more munition hungry than USF. Grenadier without weapon upgrades is one of the worse mainline infantry while PZIV and Panther without pintals are bad vs infantry... So that makes P47 rockets balanced now? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]22 Sep 2017, 20:50 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2017, 20:01 PMinsaneHoshi You should consider the following before making conclusions. Do both require sight? Which commanders come with Stuka close air support and how is the rest of their kit compared to paratroopers and etc Yes, both need sight. Do I really need to discuss this? Didn't you just see for yourself that stuka is way better and cheaper than p47??? And the fact that any ally doenst start with AA while OKW have AA everywhere. But if you want to discuss, btw I am not bias to something, I just see a huge imbalance between these abilities. Airborne company is very good in theory, you should had the solution of the USF problems, that is the late game. Paratroopers are very good and scale very but comes at 3 CP which is very bad , pathfinder can be good, but are very situational. Support weapons is OK. All abilities are vs infantry, and AT droop for a emergency, than it ends with the heavy tank killers, the P47 rockets Kappa. OK now ostheer lightning war. G43 at 1 CP, stuka and tiger. Dont need to say more. Edit: I forgot to mention that USf is ammo hungry and still p47 is more expensive that stuka. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]22 Sep 2017, 19:29 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2017, 18:44 PMelchino7 That's best case scenario when used against heavies. Compare performance against static medium tanks. If you want to further make the test easier and clearer, make the enemy tank get immobilise crit and get full map vision so you don't need extra units for the test. If the stuka's 37mm is better against heavy tanks than p-47 rockets, then it will be better in every other possible scenario when Stuka can damage engine and stun, so it's better against any other unit faster or lighter than a heavy tank. BUUUUUUT I tested, 4 pz4 against p47 vs 4 sherman easy 8 against stuka. 1 pz4 died, all shermans died in the circle. You can test yourself too. I am tired of proofing that p47 is garbage as Hell. Like very deep hell. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P-47 Rocket Strike vs Stuka Close Air Support [VIDEO Proof]22 Sep 2017, 16:55 PM https://youtu.be/L89QA15eJzo Do I really need to comment something? Stuka close air support has more damage, more area of effect, critical engine and stuns for 200 ammo P47 have, well, democracy? And for 240 ammo. BTW sorry for poor video. Edit: Lets forget the fact that OKW kills p47 in 4 seconds. Edit 2: Same test but now both abilities against the same medium tanks. https://youtu.be/4bZC2qTjRis In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Charts and Statistics - coh2Chart.com21 Sep 2017, 15:56 PM We need this In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Company of Heroes 2 Not so Balanced US Forces need real Buff21 Sep 2017, 01:31 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Sep 2017, 19:23 PMjagd wölfe No it doesn't, like ost doesn't need 5-6 man squad. FBP planned reasonable changes to make jackson more similar to firefly and usf got pershing in a ultra good commander. We can argue about balance like that, revolving around specific unit. Other than that if you don't like the usf design feel free to play any other faction. Please don't reiterate the "i don't care if i have semi auto rifles, free FRP, and best ai mediums in game i need a big tank because they have got it" argument Well. Late game doesn't mean Big tanks. I got the idea of the USF late game proposed by the developers, sounds good, doesn't work. The USF late game should consist in very good TDs with good equipped infantry and commander abilities support but everything seems so lackluster like P47 strafe run that should be the best Late game ability IF IT HIT SOMETHING. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Company of Heroes 2 Not so Balanced US Forces need real Buff18 Sep 2017, 19:10 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jul 2017, 11:20 AMTaksin02 USF only need some decent lategame unit that In: COH2 Balance
Thread: CoH 2 Statistics18 Sep 2017, 19:07 PM Where I find CoH 2 statistics like win rate, popularity and etc? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Charts and Statistics - coh2Chart.com24 Aug 2017, 20:13 PM when we'll have this feature online again? In: COH2 Balance