Profile of Jae For Jett

Less than 50 games as axis. I at least have a few hundred games as Allies.

Going by the information thats available on your playercard, 91% of your matches are on axis. 87% ostheer, 4% OKW. Just some food for thought.

Thank u for ur reminder.
A spearhand p4 could fill the huge gap between p4 and KT. OKW lacks late game AI options compared with other factions.
A spearhand p4 with low turn rate may also be more realistic, though it's not an issue anyway.

I'm not sure I quite agree:
Ost do have the brummbar.
USF has HE shermans, but the okw p4 is about as good. OKW doesn't have an analogue of the m8 scott though.
Not sure what you would say soviets have.
UKF has the centaur? But I think the okw p4 is again about as good.

Anyway, besides that, I'd argue OKW's late game AI is supposed to be obers.

Edit: I think increasing the front armor and/or giving the p4 spearhead would not only create the problems that shadowlink mentioned, but would shift it more towards an assault tank when it's currently a generalist (like most of the tanks in most other factions).

But the question is why? When suggesting a change, you should probably explain why the change is necessary (or an improvement) in the first place.

I've seen a few of your replays online and have picked up a few tips, do you have any or would you be able to upload one where you use the Jaegers effectively so that I can see? Would be really helpful. What do you think about them getting camo initially and then getting the same camo as fallschirmjaeger at vet 2?

Thanks.

To everyone,

If the unit is indeed fine, then its my issue and a L2P issue, thanks for all the feedback guys its definitely helpful.

I really appreciate how open minded you've remained throughout this discussion. I don't believe I have any replays that are compatible with the current version (well, I don't really save replays in general).

The best replays/casts of jaeger usage, and when jaegers were most meta in their current iteration, were from the lend lease era. Back then, I, and many players used jaegers A LOT. They were excellent against lend lease because jaegers do well against HMGs/Dshks (for the reasons stated in my last post), and had infiltration spawn (which really kept up the pressure against the relatively slow lend lease build and allowed you to deny crucial garrisons at will).

Of course, I wouldn't quite say the unit is exactly fine in its current state, but that's why they're getting changed in the commander revamp. Their absurd reinforce cost, and high vet requirements are two of the crucial things being addressed. As for your suggestion on camo, falls have stationary camo. They used to get this at vet 2, but they've been changed to have this at vet 0. Similarly, jaegers get stationary camo at vet 2, and they are now being changed to have this at vet 0. Basically, they are indeed being given stationary camo at vet 0, just like fallschirmjager currently have.

u still think 222 is op?

You know you're a pretty credible person when the best argument that a person with some sort of hate boner for you can come up with is a debatably correct statement (pretty sure that's also not even what I said in context) from half a year ago.