Profile of Jae For Jett

Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2018, 22:17 PMShadowLinkX37

No it implies if you're going to make BAD changes that are reasonably unbalanced for a single side, they should at least go to both sides so both sides can abuse the living crap out of it. I.e. demos only available to allies currently.

Who thought buffing the M20 lay time to 5 seconds was a good idea? Standard mines in 5 seconds from the M20? No problem. Immobilize is simply too punishing. If you hit one you need to secure 60 range towards your opponets base as well so you don't get shot at by AT guns. Then you need to actually have engineers nearby to repair the vehicle.

Weird how some people say "buy a sweeper" but I seem to remember people complaining about OHK tellers like 2 weeks ago.

Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2018, 21:07 PMShadowLinkX37

I was actually expecting a comment about the OKW IR HT. Missed opportunity

Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2018, 20:24 PMLago

Crank up the manpower cost, reduce the cost of Major in turn. That keeps Major teching paths with the same timings, but makes LT+CPT more expensive.

Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2018, 21:20 PMLoopDloop

That seems like a good idea. I agree that LT + CPT is too attractive because of the quickness of the 2 free squads, but it should still be doable and that seems like a god way to do it.

Another thing to note is that airborne really needs a rework now that it's plausible to get an at gun and an mg nondoctrinally at the same time, since it makes 40% of the abilities in the doctrine superfluous for the most part.

Jump back to quoted post17 Nov 2018, 16:03 PMOutsider_Sidaroth

This looks good.
I'm excited to see this go live.

Jump back to quoted post17 Nov 2018, 12:24 PMKatitof

Mortar range: 80
Pack howi auto attack range: 80(or is it still 60?)

Barrage range: 160

So auto attack part is irrelevant and hindering to the unit already.

Rework like that would give USF very exposed due to being inf only "katy" type unit.