Profile of A table

Literally all things that capitalist america has done. What's so special about communism?

Communism bans you from a tournament for upsetting the winnie the pooh at the top of the food chain.

Axis get it for free because they have pay all of the stuff in 1 purchase. Allies have the option to skip nades, weapon racks, medical units among others in order to more quickly advance into the next tier(s), which allows them to field light vehicles more quickly.

I don't think that giving Pgrens the option for AT rifles is a great idea, and i would rather see it being an (doctrinal?)option for Pioneers.

The main reason(imo) is that AT infantry in general tends to suffer casualties more frequently than other infantry(due to the possible danger they pose to a vehicle obviously), and the current reinforcement cost for Pgrens(36mp per model?) doesn't give a proper trade-off for scaring away light vehicles and scratching the paint on anything larger than a valentine.

This is why most AT weaponry is held by infantry that is cheaper to reinforce(Penals, Rear Echelon and Royal Engineers)with the notable exception on Sturmpioneers(though this is somewhat acceptable because of the power of the panzershreck).

This would mean that either Pgrens get a reinforcement cost reduction(an unnecessary buff)or giving them another ability alongside the Panzerbüchsupgrade(anyone's guess) if one were to make them cost- efficiënt AT- infantry until they can get Pshrecks.

Meanwhile, Pioneers are cheaper to reinforce(or outright replace) and have to sacrifice both their Flamethrower and a minesweeper for 2 AT guns.

However, it remains a question on wether this would be a death sentence for allied LV play when you throw in Panzerfausts, Pak40's or a 222 to the mix.

нет

Lol @ OP for comparing Obers to Grens because of 4 models & ''low survivability'' despite being largely different units.

Obers aren't meant to be used like grens; you should use your volksgren to act as a meatshield for Obers.