|
Dont really see the need for the assault engineers to come inside the vehicle, if one forgets this is the case then it's manpower wasted and not to mention that it's weird that all vehicles come with crews and then there is this special halftrack that for some reason comes with assault engineers, keep things consistent guys.
Another thing is that this is the perfect commander for the combined arms ability. One of the reasons no one uses this ability is because it's very hard for your infantry to keep up with your tank assault while the ability is active. Being this commander all about light vehicles, vehicles which can carry infantry right behind armored assaults making using combined arms much more viable.
As much as I like the wc51 truck I dont know if some sort of anti tank airsupport would be better in keeping this commander a viable choice...
This is how I would suggest this commander should look like:
-Raid Tactics
-M21 Mortar Half-Track
-M3 Half-Track
-Combined Arms (feels a bit expensive for what it does, maybe adjust the price and leave the ability as it is)
-P47 Rocket Run |
|
Is it really necessary for the mortar ht to have 4 firing modes tho? That feels like an overkill. |
|
I wouldnt worry a lot about the release date, just worry about giving as much feedback as possible so that the patch is the best it can be. |
Well, that's also the option to modify switching ability. I just feel like this Tank Hunter doctrine has nothing to do with hunting tanks. It feels rather like tricky AT ambush doctrine. I mean, am I supposed to hunt Axis' heavies with PTRS and camo T34/76? Seems rather tricky. Fun to use, sure, but nothing about hunting and destroying armor.
Well it's also hard to hunt tanks with an ISU and that's why I think the t-34-85 is perfect for this commander, it's a mobile tank with a very capable gun and having the repairs and armored vehicle detection makes for the perfect hunting armor commander Imo. |
I'd like to see ISU152 call-in with only AT rounds. That would be neat and would suit theme of this doctrine much more than AT Gun camo for example. Instead we have very tricky commander which definetly won't become meta or any near it. Just fun to use but nothing special.
We have to be consistent here, if this doctrine was to have the ISU-152 it would have to be exacly the same ISU-152 as other doctrines or all other ISU's would have to change to this one with only AT rounds. Imo the best tank for this doctrine is the t-34-85 because it's very mobile and has a better gun to hunt down heavier tanks and still make this commander viable for 1v1's. |
|
This commander feels more like "tank ambush tactics" rather than "tank hunter tactics"...
How can't anyone see how the conscript ptrs package is over the top? With this upgrade cons get ptrs's that make going penals redundant, they get vehicle detection that some commanders have occuping one of the five commander slots and they get grenade assault that makes upgrading AT grenade package redundant. Doens't that feel overkill just for the first commander slot?
This commander should look something like this:
-AT grenade assault (buffing this and making this replace the normal AT grenade once upgraded would be the best course of action)
-Armored vehicle detection
-Vehicle crew repair training (or salvage kits, or conscript repair kit)
-IL-2 AT bombing run
-T-34-85 (I wouldnt put anything heavier than this tank) |
FYP
+100 pls ELIMINATE Call Ins
Well I mean heavys, super heavies are alright as long as they come at late cps, are expensive and dont have any abilities. All of this to counter the great armor and big guns. |
In the russian text localization i fixed that with renaming PMD-6M into YaM-5 (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/YaM-5_box_mine), but idk what to do with TM-35.
By the way, your suggestion is balance issue, not UI issue.
That could be a solution but in that case the YaM-5 mine would have to have a bigger blast than the TM-35. Why not just change the models and make the PMD-6M work like the okw mine? |
|
Why is the TM-35 treated as an AI mine and the PMD-6M as an AT mine? It's precisely the other way around, it would be nice to see that fixed.
|
|
Thank god more commander tanks now require tech to be built, now make all the other non super heavy tanks this way. #killcallinmeta |
Portugal
0
Ace
LiquidSun
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
