concerning Jaeger doc, its perhaps not balanced properly, but as the current meta is, it needs it, and many players like me, feel punished if we don't go that doctrine, something else needs to be balanced before this doc gets balanced.
and regarding the 3 static arty pieces, every one of them can be killed with offmap/dives etc.
static arties is always a risk, just like everything else in the game.
but the big question here is how we make the ML-20 great again
When u want to make it great again, means you make it more usefully for players than going into the actually meta.
Which means allies have actually the arty advantage in their hand. (mobile arty platforms + massive better offmaps options)
Question 1: would be great again if it would be a exact clone from lefh? no it wouldnt...because other allies arty options are better and the sov player would even go into ISU after this patch.
SO this means ML20 must be even more better and more attractive than a LEFH. For example, it gets brace or something.
this leads to:
Question 2: Why should it better than a lEFH? wouldnt it be more fair to bring down other allies arty option more in down, so the ML20 would be more attravtive? Actually when the allies team decided to go deep into arty spam combined with alot of AT then axis is fu ked up...because u need panthers or something into their backlines to bring down their artys.
Dont make ML20 great again...nerv other arty options like a priest/secton must stand 15sec after shooting. or somehting...so it can be countert.