Profile of Lago

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3260

General Information
Steam: 76561198031945233


Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares11 Oct 2019, 15:57 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:54 PMThe Spycrab Correct me if i am wrong, but aren't brens a long range weapon, you know where the commando stens are useless? so how do you treat it then? a CQC squad of like a regular IS? Commandos get a special Bren Gun variant that does a ton more damage and fires on the move like Paratrooper LMGs. The Commando Stens are useless, but the two Brens do Obersolaten-level damage by themselves so it doesn't matter. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares11 Oct 2019, 15:53 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:39 PMT.R. Stormjäger Your suggestion though would probably cause mass hysteria, it’s quite OP af. I don't see any broken combinations in there. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares11 Oct 2019, 15:39 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:32 PMStug life are u for real ? does the 340 mp cost and 36 reinforce cost get removed ? by that logic there is no reason to use IS over commando and rifle over para Commandos are very different units to Sections. You do replace dead Riflemen with Paratroopers if you've gone Airborne. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares11 Oct 2019, 15:35 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:27 PMT.R. Stormjäger Because Falls alone have to make their doctrine relevant. It’s fine if you wanna campaign for Falls to be just another mediocre Elite infantry unit, but that’s not gonna happen. Then give the doctrine something else. Maybe something like this? Stuka Smoke Recon Fallschirmjager Airdrop Pak 40 Anti-Aircraft Doctrine (bundled Field Defences and Ostwind Flakpanzer) Stuka Dive Bomb Then it's another good teamgame doctrine. What we shouldn't do is keep the current Fallschirmjager design out of a misguided 'every unit must be relevant no matter how bad it is' philosophy. The Bofors got soft-removed for a reason. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares11 Oct 2019, 15:21 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:16 PMHon3ynuts Yes this would provide a better way to scout for invis unit. Additionally right now there is no reason to buy a volk when you can replace it with a fall. I think it's key to remember when the Game was released and falls had panzerfausts, It was the only unit in the OKW roster that did have faust. Volks had shreks It was also the old Falls, which didn't have Vet 0 cloaking or First Strike and died when you looked at them funny. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rangers have got to be reduced to 9 pop11 Oct 2019, 15:19 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 04:57 AMCODGUY Is there not endless bitching and moaning about USF now that they improved Riflemen? Then they nerfed the M20 for no reason lol. They nerfed the M20 because it was reportedly too powerful in high level play. As for Rangers being 10 pop, sure, they could be 9. It'd make very little difference. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares11 Oct 2019, 15:16 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Oct 2019, 15:11 PMT.R. Stormjäger What if Falls had an AT grenade that stuns light vehicles for like 3-5 secs, but doesn’t damage them? That way they can’t fight LVs, but if they are caught by one in cloak they can stun and retreat. Commandos don't have that. Cloaking PGrens don't have that. JLI don't have that. Stormtroopers don't have that. Pathfinders don't have that. Why should Fallschirmjager? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How are Infantrysections since patch?11 Oct 2019, 15:02 PM UKF was bad Ostheer with 280 man super soldiers that blew up any CQC units by tossing grenades at their own feet. Now they're just bad Ostheer. I think the Balance Team needs to decide how they're intended to be played, and then give them the tools to do that effectively. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fallschirmjager should lose snares11 Oct 2019, 14:59 PM Fallschirmjager, like the last problem OKW squad, are cloaking elite anti-infantry infantry. The natural counter to such units is vehicles. However, Fallschirmjager have a Panzerfaust. This makes it unsafe to scout them out with anything with less health than a Valentine. Given they drop in at CP2, this isn't a realistic counter. This results in a unit that: Can't be forced out of position by long range infantry, because they cloak and therefore cannot be targeted at range if they don't want to be. Can't be forced out of position by short range infantry because of their high damage and bundle grenade ambush. Can't be flushed out by light vehicles because it can snare them, rendering them sitting ducks for a Puma or Raktenwerfer. Something's gotta give. Either Falls need to lose their ambush camouflage so they can be attacked outside of close range, or they need to lose their snare so they can be flushed out by light vehicles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Prioritise Vehicles11 Oct 2019, 14:48 PM If a vehicle is set to Prioritise Vehicles, you issue it a non-vehicle target (like the OKW flak HQ) and then issue it a move order (to avoid an ATG for example), it cancels the attack command. I just found this out the hard way. This is highly unintuitive and should be fixed if possible. In: COH2 Bugs