Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: Unused stuff in CoH2 (for commanders update)10 Jul 2018, 21:07 PM Don't forget the Panzerbüchse 39 in campagne. It would fit perfect for Osttruppen instead of LMG42. There are also concrete bunkers, which would fit perfect for OKW-Defence, also Pantherturm and mortar-bunker. In: Lobby
Thread: Second Commander Rework10 Jul 2018, 21:04 PM Some Ostheer commanders are still useless, like the Luftwaffe Supply Doctrine. The medicin packs are obsolete since the price reduction of feld-med and the incendiary bombing-run needs way more damage, like soviet incendiary ability. Beside, maybe give Osttruppe the Panzerbüchse 39 instead of LMG42. Or change tank-traps of Community Commander with concrete teeths with more hp. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch13 Dec 2017, 12:02 PM 1. That was partially my owe. ^^ 2. It will stay the same, not the center of the squad will be attacked. This 3rd member of the troup can stay anywhere. The attacking unit would try to find that memeber, that would destroy the hole commandibility. 3. You can still make attack-ground with the mortar without benefit from Vet-range-buff. But killing the hole auto-fire is to much for my taste. Edit: It is a possibility, but not for this patch. 4. - In: Lobby
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch13 Dec 2017, 11:07 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Dec 2017, 01:28 AMAceOfTitanium ... 1. To modify all animations there is no possibility to manage that. We have to wait for real tools, an addon or CoH3. 2. There is no center. 3. The mortar lives by his passivity. In my opinion the only weapon systems that could be managed like that are direct artilleries like leIG18, Haubitze or Zis -> we still have. 4. To much suppression will destroy the game. It isn't Man-of-War where you can flank like a crazy horse. Maybe with abilities -> we still have. ALL OVER ALL, this thread is for easy fixing and small ideas. In: Lobby
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch13 Dec 2017, 00:26 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Dec 2017, 16:24 PMOsinyagov What is it inside this link? It was only a pic of my prototype of Tiger-Ace. Now the link is working. https://1drv.ms/i/s!Auba63jVJDDGnKxDR3_IS86Mzlgrvw We could put into the description of Vet4 and Vet5 some informations why it is so much better than a normal Vet3 Tiger. It is only cosmetic for the logic, I am a fetishist. ^^ Vet1 text: "Unlocks the 'Blitzkrieg' veteran ability." Vet2 text: "Elite crews fire with greater accuracy and range." Vet3 text: "Tiger Ace navigates the battle field with ease and fires with greater frequency." Vet4 text: "Sophisticated optimizations reduce the risk of injurys by shelling." Vet5 text: "Battlefield becomes a playground for bearers of the Knight's Cross." 1, 2, and 3 are same as for the regular Tiger. 4 would explain why the tanks has more health. 5 would explain why it has more sight. In: Lobby
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch12 Dec 2017, 14:45 PM I know it is too late, but maybe it still produces a reverberation and a wonder. I spoke already with Mr_Smith about my matter of concern. ^^ - Give Tiger-Ace decorative 5 Veterane-Stars. - Change his skin, because of ugliness to "german_0010_summer" and "german_0010_winter" https://1drv.ms/i/s!Auba63jVJDDGnKxDR3_IS86Mzlgrvw In: Lobby
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch8 Dec 2017, 12:49 PM @Osinyagov Since the introduction of MG42 Germans used as turret-MG ONLY the MG42 if available. The guns in the hull were still MG34 because of the way how to change the barrel, it wasn't possible to install MG42 there. Same for Hetzer, it had a MG34 because of maintenance and useing the MG. If you want realism here, the Hetzer shouldn't have a visible gunner, because the weapon was served from INSIDE the tank. Only while reloading the gunner had to leave save position. Also it has to turn 360°. Very modern design. PS: Also the late variant of StuG 3 Ausf. G had that kind of weapon + a coaxial-MG. We have a StuG 3 Ausf. F or a very early version of the G ingame. Maybe we can change the used name ingame to make it correct. The differences: In: Lobby
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch7 Dec 2017, 21:37 PM Hey, there is one wish of mine. Can we remove the MG42 turret/shield of StuG3 Ausf. G before the battle-upgrade was made? The StuG has so a beautiful Silhouette, but that MG destroys the aesthetic. At that time we can also give StuG3 Ausf. E. same MG-Upgrade as the normal StuG too. I personally never upgrade the StuG, because the gunner will reveal the tank in ambush. So it looks: https://1drv.ms/v/s!Auba63jVJDDGnKw4ylcp5KWOsI0QQQ If you shoot out the crew the shield will stay on the vehicle, the new owner has "only" to update the gunner again. How to make: sbps\race\german\vehicles\stug_iii_suqad\stug_iii_squad_mp <squad_action_apply_ext <"2. requirement_action" add: <"2. animator_set_state" apply_to_leader_only "false" do_action_state_name "Off" retrigger "false" state_machine_name "pintle_mg42_visibility" <"3. requirement_action" add: <"2. animator_set_state" apply_to_leader_only "false" do_action_state_name "On" retrigger "false" state_machine_name "pintle_mg42_visibility" In: Lobby
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch6 Dec 2017, 16:12 PM @Osinyagov Sniper's indicator doesn't have the arrows on it. But I like it because you know how the tank is positioned. That is kind of luxury haha. We have to find a decent look, so it isn't a problem if you have more vehicles under commando. One thing that could become a problem is, that mobile units with 60+ range become to easy to use. They will become more dominant than now in 2vs2 upward. We have to think about giving Ost Tiger 50 range and 55 with Vet2 so more Commanders Can deal with that. Also british QF6pounder needs some changes, maybe remove 25% multiblier and give it pen of Zis to compensate the access to 17punder and Firefly. Even then it has more DPS than all other Allii Paks. Because now it is a more accurate, faster turning PaK40 clone. And don't forget the PaK40 got a nerf too. But that is my opinin. EDIT: Maybe give Tigerass an other skin, it really looks so ugly. ^^ In: Lobby
Thread: Some easy solvable design issues for December patch6 Dec 2017, 13:28 PM Off-Topic continuing... it is like "Machicolation", in German they are "Wurfscharte" (throw-loop) or also "Maschikuli". My problems are these French borrowed words that destroy my mind. ^^ But say me, are you "pro" or "contra" weapon indicators for tanks? In: Lobby