Balance and optimization.
1-Pretty obvious, we have enough content already, now we need it to work properly.
2-It runs terribly even on good GPU and CPU... |
Never have i came across a game were that "feature" gave the allies the definite edge on a stalemate. To amass that many fuel without you being able to do anything about it, i hate to say it, but you were snoozing on sentry duty mate.
|
USFs support weapons are a completely joke. The MG is somehow similar to OKWs MG34, the AT gun is the worst ingame (besides that Soviet commander AT gun I have never ever seen) and the mortar is non existent.
Buff the support weapons slightly and nerf rifles slightly and the result will be a faction that suddenly has various more viable tactics instead os simple rifle blobbing.
There is still a major issue, HMG is locked behind a serious quantity of fuel, if rifles are to be nerfed then 50.cal must be part of the initial tier 1 package. Otherwise early game USF (it's only real strong point) is over alongside with the faction's playability.
|
Thread: T 34s18 Mar 2016, 01:25 AM
Make T-34 great again Relic.
On a serious note, for how long have been people clamouring for a usable (non-doctrine specific) soviet medium tank?
How yeah...ever since they had the bright idea to push it into Tier 4. |
Panzer III would be a downgrade. Makes no sense to be added in game.
Maybe for a African front themed COH? *crosses fingers* |
Lol 2 years and now another Last Stand DLC? When would Lelic fix grenade bug? When will Chaos Shrine works properly?
Dude, i'm pretty sure they pulled the rug from under Dawn of war 2 long time ago.
Hoping they are developing dawn of war 3. |
Well the land mattress has already been substantially nerfed. Before that two of them fresh on the field would obliterate the tier 3 structure of the OKW in one shot (each).
Called it. |
The only thing they will learn is that you can get more money out of Free2Play titles.
You over estimate the F2P model. Specially with so many s*** F2P out there that made people very weary of getting sucked into such a scheme again. There aren't that many successful F2P games out there, most have just managed to alienate paying costumers with their extortion schemes. |
|
This is hardly lazy when compared to 80% of the German and Soviet factions. These two factions are pretty content-full if you ask me. Both commanders combined only share 2 abilities combined (though both are in Mobile Assault, the M2 Flamethrower upgrade and the Vehicle Crew Repairs) You are far too picky when it comes to these things; it appears that all you want with new commanders is completely new content and assets. Which isn't always possible from both an economic and developmental point of view (it's going to cost a lot of money to do that, and it's going to take time - and if you're able to do both, you'll run out of ideas content real quick, as I know from personal experience). Mechanics like Counter-Battery and Advanced Cover Tactics are perfectly fine.
Also, your ranting about the M2 Flamethrower is like complaining about a standard artillery barrage being included in multiple doctrines across different factions. Which is to say, it's not a good argument. However, I will agree that having the Life Bouy flamethrower instead of the M2 would be nice. And yea, I totally agree that our Advanced Emplacement commander needs to take the tape off his fake beard and grow a real one.
+1 |