Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: the cure for cancer (aka emplacement)14 Mar 2016, 15:22 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 15:18 PMIGOR to me this is like your super heavys covered by shreks and shit,is fking hard to kill dude but once you do it your opponent is screwed, almost no way back. if your opponent gone ''cancer regiment'' that's all he has. as soon as you destroy it GG... Just to let you know if he has full volks blob you should have a full sim city Bofors and pit counter the blob In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cure for cancer (aka emplacement)14 Mar 2016, 15:04 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 14:32 PMaaa How advanced emplacements better than normal morter pit and bofos? And what is better vs oh matress or adv emplaicmernt? I dont understand how emplplacement can have any use if there is 8CP LEFT. Counter barrage and the upgrade gives emplacement 20 % more hp In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cure for cancer (aka emplacement)14 Mar 2016, 15:00 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 14:56 PMIGOR sorry the bad english, this is not my native language. in my point of view yes 400 mp for a immobile mortar is too much, and to every bofors it costs 25 fuel so that delays your tanks. Bro they have toon of hp 2 mortar more range(in some map 2 vp plus fuel) ,brace Bofors got 1000 hp an arty + suppress "ability (is ready) brace and gives problem even to some medium tank Just this 2 unit lock down an entire area In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cure for cancer (aka emplacement)14 Mar 2016, 14:49 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 14:43 PMIGOR real cancer is your schreck blobs, that combined with more shrek blobs just rapes everything on its path. emplacements are a huge investment(and cannot move, thats why they need brace), and as soon as you destroy them, brit player will be in a really bad situation. "Your" is the op hitler? And yes give volks 2 at rifle + snare and we are good Huge investment More like spam and build one as soon as one is destroyed (like 10 min couse that's what you get brace and high hp ) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cure for cancer (aka emplacement)14 Mar 2016, 14:21 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 14:20 PMaaa Its misleading to estimate numbers only. If you count mp+fuel and unit types for that mp fuel its would be clear oh teching is cheap as okw is. Ie sov sniper mg cons cost more than same oh units All Light vehicles, mediums same story with bigger MP/F difference Guess who has more man ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cure for cancer (aka emplacement)14 Mar 2016, 14:19 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 14:04 PMaaa Its already have been said to stfu about emplacement being a cancer. Cancers are oh starting mp buff and low cost of both axis faction tech tree. Germ faction is often played in a similar fagy way sit with mg in the center while having extra squad for initial capping bust. Yesterday i won a game vs this faggy strat with 1 VP left. Aaa Anti Axis Airhead(the best not offensive insult I could find) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen OP with Vet patch 14 Mar 2016, 13:16 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 12:32 PMKatitof What range? What vet? What cover? And yeah, the investment is very similar here, so there is no reason why it shouldn't. In addition, from vet4 onwards, there is no infantry in game what can beat obers without green cover. How about you, for once, eat your own advise and be consctructive? You know, put some stats into the perspective instead of covering yourself with Main Kampf every time anyone asks you for reason. Both gren range medium vet 3 vs vet 1-2 don't expect much I m constructive couse I said to change the to 15-17 reinforce cost not nerf them to the ground Unlike you in every post "l2p" " your opinion is irrelevant " In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen OP with Vet patch 14 Mar 2016, 12:09 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 11:57 AMNemesis10192 Then what does US have? Its armor is vastly outclassed, and you want OKW infantry to be better too just because some are classed as "elite"? Well then now US has shitty end game armour and also infantry who are going to die... Lets not pretend making rangers or paratroopers (both doc dependent) is an answer...all OKW elite inf is long range and rangers are up close= worse in most cases. "Vastly outclassed" what the panther and ? I'm not talking only for okw pg exist and are elite And the myth ally early axis late needs to stop Try to out pop cap 1 game I had 5 Jackson 3 Sherman 4 calliope and 1 major guess who got 150 pop cap And guess who win (4vs4) Ober and pg 4 men I HE shell Sherman = -400 (320) mp In: COH2 Balance
Thread: the cure for cancer (aka emplacement)14 Mar 2016, 11:48 AM 95 for the pit and is a deal In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Riflemen OP with Vet patch 14 Mar 2016, 11:35 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2016, 11:32 AMEsxile What you say isn't even true. Between Jackson and Pz4, the result depend on which shot first. Same with volks and rifle depends on cover but my point is dat a versatile inf Main line should not beat a more expensive dedicated anti infantry elite inf (Like a Sherman vs an elefant) In: COH2 Balance