I suppose you don't even remember M-42 exists.
Use camo on raketen and don't treat it like frontline squad, have volks nearby to faust and you'll see a world of difference.
UKF version also requires 200mp to be put first and can be killed with small arms.
But that's inconvenient fact for you so better ignore it, right?
Its a tier, not a unit.
You want to be able to control it? Give it a pop cost.
Except for one of the best players in game(Hans) that is? Though you don't need to be on his level to be successful with it-harder to use doesn't mean underpowered.
I see as always you can just point out the flaws of other and never give your opinion bantiof
Mind telling us what you think of other point ? |
Considering the title this list should also include their mines. The mines still cause heavy engine damage and do not suppress infantry. all mines are like that |
All faction need spend a lot of resource to research late tech for build premium medium tanks.
But for allies premium mediums Must be spam for stand a chance against Axis armor in late game but not for Axis Panther.
Because all allies premium medium tank is worth for deal with infantry and tanks but Panther only worth for beat tanks.
well we cant directly compare Panther vs EZ8, T-34/85 because both of them are doctrine units.
Compare Panther vs Comet might be a well position because both of them are non-doctrine units.
Comet is really good and worth to spam more 2 or 3, panther is only good against tank even they are almost the same price.
But the real problem is ... i don't think Panther is not good enough for his job ... really hard to beat allies tanks .. and always got outnumber by allies mediums ... and Rate of Fire is like ... maybe loader need go to toilet before loading next round.
I think just buff RoF should make Panther serve the role "the medium thank that expert in tank battle" more than the current is . rate of fire is ok maybe a sec less but it needs to have 0.75 accuracy on the move |
ugh people enough with your "insert facton here" biased this or that. let not even dare start with "insert insult here" bla bla bullshit... A conversation doesn't need to degrade to this you are and should be capable of better than that. tightrope made a perfectly good poll and thread and frankly you should be able to atlest be able to be repsectful to tightrope not to ruin his thread...
/resume discussion well I don't mind if you remove the discussion between me and cobra but just don't remove the suggestion |
|
did you change aa range for brit mortar too if not it will be unplayable |
See, just when you said that you're not and ostheer fanboy.
Yes it doesn't cost 120 munition, it costs 380mp/145 fuel and deals less DPS.
HT can kill an AT gun just as easy and can flank it faster.
not bad?
omg the kv8 can kill at gun from the front and I already said that has more dot stop being biased in not nerfing it I'm putting on tier 4 and reducing the price
Like the ez 8 and t34/85 |
More durable how? It's all relative.
Stats show some thing, the game itself show another.
KV tanks are made for durability.
HT, are fast, durable enough, and can take up to three shots from a T34 before dying.
That's really something don't you think? For a scout car?
The HT flamethrower is a double flamethrower and thus does more damage than any flamethrower in the game.
It serves its purpose as an anti-mg or anti-inf purpose.
The KV8 doesn't do as much AOE as before.
Kv8 as more dot and doesn't cost 120 munition
And can easily kill all at gun |
|
Aim time fix fur rakket and ptrs
Sweeper and sherck to SP
Too please |
Yes, but it's not as good as it was, so I don't think it's op or as good a a tier 4 tank.
Also the flame halftrack is the best flamethrower, not the kv8
Wrong is croc>both flamethrower of HT >kv8>flamethrower HT>hetzer>wasp
Get your fact straight and kv8 is 10 time more durable than HT
Btw point out how I'm a fanboy especially ost as I don't play them very much this patch |
dat flamethrower as you say has been nerfed 3 times already, right now it's barely good, it's in between decent and shit, it hardly does any fast damage, no effective AOE and only good because it can take some damage before dying.
Unless that's what you meant when you said price reduction and not that locking it behind tier 4 = price reduced.
What if the shock doctrine is good because it has these 2 call-ins? If you get beat by a soviet who call-in both these tanks I think you're pretty much deserving it.
Therefor locking up these tanks behind tier 4 is actually going to force you to make a choice and you won't ever have to chose between these 2 tanks.
Besides IS2 right now, like somebody said above, it's plain shit.
The problem with command P4 is what's the point in building tier 3 if you want this tank?
Same goes for many other call-ins.
What is also the point in reducing the cost if you need to tech? Wasn't the point not to allow to get tanks with easy cost?
I don't really understand tightrope myself, it pretty much feels like he is mad that some players won't let go in mid-late game and can just win with call-ins.
kv8 its the best flamethrower after crocodile (single) |
Katitof-2018 
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
