Profile of Stug life

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 4474

General Information


Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?4 Jun 2018, 22:20 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 22:13 PMswordfisch I'll tell you when they come bren carrier comes early but is useless until it upgrades to flamer at 3mins, then by 4mins it is dead to 222 due to no snare to protect it. 251 is usually built after 222 and is used to mop up brits as you melt their crappy mortar pit or whatever units they have. Don't worry about AEC because you have snare to shield your units unlike them. Wasp should be buffed (old range and more mobility) and get a price increase, it needs survivability. yea useless, it has old breen dps (so range doesn't matter and is actually better at long) does not bleed,it has actual armor unlike similar vehicle, btw how can the difference between 5 and 30 fu be 3 min but from 30 to 60 (this is without the the fuel cost of teh 222) just 40 sec ? maybe u should redo ur math class before posting are u kidding me ? just build an at gun, the truck is made to shine vs static defence, the aec comes right after by tech cost In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?4 Jun 2018, 22:07 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 22:03 PMswordfisch hey stug bias you need tech for the wasp too just ignore all the other plus points the flamer 251 gets though, you know like double flamers. can u please do the math and tell me when they come ? i do rember 30<60 uneless someone toyed with the basic rules of mathemathics if not then it does comes with the tier advantage obviusly it's better it cost more and is on a different tier, what did u want the wasp to perform the same ? for less than 1/4 of the cost ? btw i would be biased if i atctually asking the conc. barrage to shoot in the FOG unlike all the other similar ability cause u eant some easy wins with ukf In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?4 Jun 2018, 21:57 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 18:16 PMswordfisch there's no contest, flamer HT can survive into lategame compared to WASP due to more health and better mobility/pathing thanks to the semi turret flamers. Cost means jack when it actually survives after 5 minutes. Do not underestimate the moving 251 flamers, WASP is fucked by having to face every single unit or building dead on and then rotate full 90 degrees and reverse. Ususally this gets your WASP killed as soon as any mobile unit hits the field (222, luch) one cost fuel,tech and more munitions both have 30 range (the previus patch the UC had actually more range) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Spring Update - Balance thread4 Jun 2018, 21:54 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2018, 17:17 PMwandererraven Result of this Patch UKF need buff in next patch for sure maybe this time they will buff the stuff they never use or in area where they lack goughartgough In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So why exactly can't UKF/USF base buildings be destroyed ?4 Jun 2018, 21:47 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 15:06 PMswordfisch I see you've convienesntly ignored the fact Gren MG42 and rifle nade is free from side tech cost and most importantly they have a snare to deal with vehicles. Now with the nerf brens are roughly the same with a single MG42 squad in DPS, so you can't really fall back on that line either. Cover bonus was also nerfed, as were tommy snipers that were removed from vet 3. Trenches were also hit by the nerf bat too. Are you still living 12months in the past? Brits have the weakest early game my dude everyting axis has is free right ? always the same arguemnt and is in the fucking word too SIDE TEECCCHHH why in COH 1 this was never an argument but in COH 2 is ? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine4 Jun 2018, 21:44 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 16:08 PMEsxile Puma and T34 have around the same cost while one requires full tech. Jackson and Stug have the same tech price but one is 1.5 more expensive that the other one. And one stug doesn't counter one Jackson but two yes, number you should have a couple of minutes later after a Jackson hit the field. Which bring us to the sole problem here with the Puma/T34, by the time you have a T34, Ostheer have 2 Puma and this is no match for the Soviet. dude it was about AEC at least read in context In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mobile Defence doctrine4 Jun 2018, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2018, 15:39 PMKatitof How did you estimated that is beyond my comprehension. Puma has 10 more range, all other stats are comparable or irrelevant in their engagement. Puma got CLEAR advantage here. actually the puma is less accurate on the move and has crappy mg (the mg shots can pen the armor of the puma and u get the idea) still why now range matter kat ? i thought that the jackson would always lose to stug and panther cause the 10 range doesn't matter ? now it's important again ? if i didn't know u i might have thought u have double standards In: COH2 Balance
Thread: sexton: Why it suck and how to make it better.3 Jun 2018, 00:04 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2018, 15:07 PMFiresparks let's get back to topic before we were so rudely interrupted. Using the priest as a baseline for SPG, spg have shorter range and less shell per barrage. the towed howitzer both have 250 meter range and fire more shell per barrage. It is also important to note that priest shell individually have a bigger kill radius. The range of 180m for the priest is also enough for its purpose. The first thing to note for the sexton is the fact its shell is significantly weaker. This is likely due to the fact the 25 pounder fired a smaller shell compared to the 105mm. The weaker shell will likely remain weaker. Thus a range of 200-215 for the sexton would mean it fire farther than the priest, but with a weaker shell. Compared to the towed howitzer, a range of 200-215 would still mean the sexton have a shorter range, less shell per barrage, and a weaker shell. let's test 180 range first, after all it shoot more than priest In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Give OKW flame nade a tech cost?31 May 2018, 19:19 PM Jump back to quoted post31 May 2018, 19:10 PMEsxile Please guys, I was saying you need 30 fuel before being able to use the Wasp, not that it cost 30 fuel each one. Like it is not a T0 ability. same for flame nades what's the point ?? (most funny is "RRRREEEEE flame nades are free they come with tech cost" but "the wasp cost fuel as it comes only after tier 1") In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fix AT Partisans 31 May 2018, 18:10 PM they cost a ton to reinforce and are really sqishy, i would argue that instead they need a buff in the form of letting them be able to merge with con like all other soviet units In: COH2 Balance