Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Is the STG-44 upgrade for volks worth the investment?22 Nov 2016, 11:28 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2016, 11:04 AMIron Emperor Is losing a slot to pick up a dropped weapon and losing 60 muni a good trade off for the STG? 5 k98-----------22.8 17.3 13.5 10.4 (Range 0,10,20,30) 2MP44+3k98--29.7 25.1 18.3 12.2 buff to DPS----130% 145% 135% 117% It allow VG to fight allied infantry at all ranges and it probably one of the reason why VG still get to vet 5 and people do not spam SP... you can always keep a Vg with out it to pic any weapon dropped... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Is the STG-44 upgrade for volks worth the investment?22 Nov 2016, 10:51 AM Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2016, 10:10 AMIron Emperor Hey Guys, Cons: Losing long range dps that is incorrect, you do not lose long range DPS and that is why it is badly designed upgrade... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to fix: OKW21 Nov 2016, 19:38 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2016, 19:30 PMNubb3r ..Taking it away would make garrisons super op agains okw... I was not taking about removing anti-garrison from OKW I was talking about moving it to specialized unit. For instance SP could get WP grenade with both shot blocking and Anti garrison properties, Ober could have their Blendkörper grenade at VET0 doctrinal solutions: infiltration tactics FJ could get a could have their Blendkörper at vet and their bundle at Vet 1 PF could have the grenade replaced by incendiary JLIR could also get a incendiary DOT weapon are far better for spawning units since that would allow enemy player the time to react... One could even improve the Leig and Luch vs garrison a bit... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to fix: OKW21 Nov 2016, 17:03 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2016, 16:49 PMFul4n0 ...so yeah, gonna fix the broken things, and gonna improve the game...for all. In my opinion giving smoke to Lieg and some specialized OKW infantry would improve the game especially if incendiary grenades where removed from V.G. (as other mainline infantry). Imo Smoke grenades and anti-garrison grenades should be limited to specialized infantry and not mainline infantry. That utility would entourage people to use more units types. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to fix: OKW21 Nov 2016, 16:38 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Nov 2016, 15:48 PMFul4n0 ... again, going back to the point where I started to reply you, let´s fix what is broken, not what is boring in your opinion.... Why not fix what would improve the game, especially if it is an easy fix. Most Broken things are bugs and should be fixed anyway they also have little to do with balance... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Unreliability of mortar smoke20 Nov 2016, 17:03 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2016, 16:50 PMTiger Baron Wut? Bug a separate issue I was refereeing to design... In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Unreliability of mortar smoke20 Nov 2016, 15:53 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2016, 15:50 PMWilliam Christensen ... The tank' smoke is an immidiate action to help save your tanks out of danger so yeah, it's different.‎ I am not talking panzer tactician or other form of defensive smoke I talking tank firing smoke at range. Smoke fired at range should be similar for most units or mortars should have the extra utility of deploying faster. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Unreliability of mortar smoke20 Nov 2016, 13:50 PM In addition smoke should be delivered faster imo. Infantry and tanks seem able to deliver smoke allot faster reducing the utility of mortars. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: How to fix: OKW19 Nov 2016, 16:37 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2016, 16:23 PMOutsider_Sidaroth US support weapon squad members still drop like flies, you are better off stealing an MG from the Germand and using handheld AT most of the time, at least in my experience. Also the Riflemen vs Volks combat often comes to RNG and the use of cover so I don't see how it is strong as ever. 1) The most important change to USF support weapons was the introduction of the mortar that allows riflemen to stay in cover and have indirect support. Other than that: 57mm ATG Penetration from 140/125/115 to 150/140/130 Accuracy changed from 0.05/0.0425/0.03 to 0.055/0.05/0.04 M2HB HMG Team M2HB .50cal HMG penetration from 3/2/1 to 7/6/5. New Ability: Armored Piercing Rounds - Timed ability that loads AP rounds for 25% increased damage and +10 penetration. 2) Riflemen received no nerf, the introduction of the ST44 for Volks is another mistake and I have explain why in a earlier post(see page 2 point 2). So USF support weapon and direct fire support (USF's Achilles tendon) got massively buffed (captain arty,M8 )yet their strong point riflemen received no nerfs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to fix: OKW19 Nov 2016, 16:20 PM Asymmetrical balance can work just fine. That is not the current issue. Imo current issues are: 1) Veterancy/abilities this section of the game has seen very little changes since the beginning of the game even though unit have changed roles. Example: Penals if one doubles the far accuracy adds a vet ability for extra accuracy and R.O.F. and leaves the 1.69 total accuracy bonus untouched he is asking for trouble. (Penal accuracy exceeds 100% even at mid ranges) 2) Bring faction closer by only buffing the faction weakness and not nerfing their strength...Examples: 1)USF get a great boost in support weapon but their infantry remain as strong as ever. 2)Soviet have their stock units buffed but their call in remain available to most commanders, come at early CP and allot of them are very cost efficient... In: COH2 Gameplay