Profile of Vipper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Lets talk about Doctrines28 Oct 2017, 15:46 PM These existing abilities work a bit differently than described. Soviet are not meant to have very powerful off map abilities because they have plenty of MU. UKF have powerful abilities by design. Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2017, 14:22 PMAngrade (Ægion) 3. No Retreat, no surrender -too similar to hold the line and too gimmicky. Actually this ability make your units unable to retreat and was hard to use. One could change it in away that becomes more player friendly for instance: NKV officer gives bonuses (as a timed ability) but units affected can not retreat for the duration + something Or units that retreat lose 1-2 members on base arrival that can be returned as Strafbats (poor quality troops) a bit simiat to rapid conscription. Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2017, 14:22 PMAngrade (Ægion) 6. Sector Air Cover would be too similar to the IL2 loiter. (it maybe it because I can not remember the voice line to it.) This brings multiple planes. It probably closer to the OKW one. Jump back to quoted post28 Oct 2017, 14:22 PMAngrade (Ægion) Green T34/76 Max health 400 making it either a 3 shot kill or a 2 shot and snare kill. increased target size by 2 unable to vet skin locked to default green skin. still have access to ramming Green T34/76 are stunned when hit similar to JT Some of these abilities have actually made it in the game in mission packs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Mechanized Grenadier Group27 Oct 2017, 14:26 PM Your assumption of a durably Grenadier hold little water. A number of weapon will damage both vehicle and occupants and number of snares will actually target passengers and wipe them out even if they disembark. CP 3 is also a bit late for one to be producing Grenadiers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Faction Fuel Balancing26 Oct 2017, 17:39 PM On fuel "discrepancies" check how low cost the AEC has. These "discrepancies" hardly create imbalance. The main current balance issue come from the "discrepancies" in the mainline infantry and "discrepancies" in the call in units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Fuel Balancing26 Oct 2017, 17:30 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 16:27 PMzerocoh AoE means shit when acc and rof are so low. Which you conveniently didn't mention... T-70 has low ROF?? seriously? with 2.43 reload is one of the faster ballistic guns with AOE. All guns that uses AOE as the main source of damage have low Accuracy. PLS learn the difference between weapons that use hits (accuracy) to do damage and weapons that use AOE to do damage, before continuing this. If in your opinion T-70 does not enough damage to infantry pls explain why so. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Fuel Balancing26 Oct 2017, 16:23 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 16:13 PMzerocoh Stop spreading missinformation and bullshitting. Luchs gun have much more effective AoE than T70. They perform closely equal but luchs gun have far more RoF, and at vet 2 he can just keep the dps on the move. Read, understand, reply... Luch uses accuracy its AOE is 1 with 0.1/0.6 multiplier and 16 damage. T-70 uses AOE its AOE is 1.75 0.15/0.8 multiplier and 40 damage. T-70 does more damage at 1.75 than Luch does at 0.25. PLS: "Stop spreading missinformation and bullshitting." In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk about Doctrines26 Oct 2017, 14:26 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 14:09 PMAngrade (Ægion) The cost is 30 so it is already cheap. The Grenadier variant in my mod gains one G43 to help with damage. Maybe to adjust the camo settings to allow them more movement for the camo? Remember they do have a first strike bonus of x1.5 accuracy bonus for 5 seconds which really does help. I was also thinking of allowing Pioneers and AT guns to upgrade this as well. Maybe mortars too? So if they were going to get flanked they could just hide until they pass. It not in live grenadier need a weapon upgrade and camo for 90 for the first strike bonus that enemy can simply go back and wait for 5 sec to wear off. Other stronger units get much better thing fro 90 Mu. I don't like units that can move with camo personally. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Faction Fuel Balancing26 Oct 2017, 14:18 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 11:03 AMWhyThatSadFace? I understand, but isn't that just different means for the same purpose, Infantry-Hunting? Not really T-70 in addition to kill infantry the T-70 can counter light vehicles, Recon and cap. Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 11:03 AMWhyThatSadFace? Your first argument doesn't connect to me: How is the enemy you are facing correlating with the fuel-discrepancy? Shouldn't similar roles equal in a similar resource-cost? Please don't get me wrong, I really enjoy the differencies between the factions and I don't agree on comments that propose making the core-units (like MGs, Motars etc.) all the same. And I don't have any problems with the T3 costing maybe 10 Fuel more then the T2-equivalent of the OKW. But 35 Fuel more, doesn't seem right. Not really each faction need the tools do deal with it has to face. Luch is an anti-blob vehicle because allies tend to blob more. In addition try to see the teching in if full, for instance the SU-76 is far more cost efficient than the Puma. Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 11:03 AMWhyThatSadFace? Which then cost 5 Fuel more then the T-70, which makes the discrepancy rise to 45 fuel and still not have undermined the core-argument: Why this discrepancy? Now you are comparing different thing since Su-76 is an AT unit and actually one of the most cost efficient units in the game. Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 11:03 AMWhyThatSadFace? I agree, there should always be more then one option to counter an enemy-measure. Although, OKW gets an MG-Option at T0 with the first Halftrack set up, which seems to be an effictive counter-measure, besides the Luchs and later on the Stuka-zu-Fuß... but that's too far up in the game already. But again, I want to stay focussed on the discrepancy-discussion, not Penals Thank you for your reply I am not focusing on Penal but Soviet have trouble vs Luch only if they choose to spam Penals. Penals is an OP unit very difficult to counter (as shown in factional showdown) and thus even if there are fuel discrepancies that does lead to imbalance, actually its the Soviet that are OP and need to be toned down. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Lets talk about Doctrines26 Oct 2017, 12:41 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 11:20 AMAngrade (Ægion) Jaeger Infantry This doctrine to me feels like camouflaging infantry and ambush. However, it has two late game munition sinks in already a heavy munitions based doctrine. Proposel is to change the CAS to a Jaeger Light Infantry, very similar to the OKW. (affected by stormtooper bulletin) With the changes to camo the camo is a rather UP ability so I would suggest giving some RA bonuses as well and lowering cost. The G43/LMG (in your mod) is wierd on the PG so I would suggest that the ability for PG now give 4+1 g43 (around Ranger m1 Garrard level) and allows an extra member (no schrecks). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Faction Fuel Balancing26 Oct 2017, 09:57 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2017, 09:00 AMWhyThatSadFace? ... That's true, I don't think, soviets need another unit, but I just wonder how this Fuel-discrepancy between the Luchs and T-70 can be explained, since they fullfill similar roles, don't you think? ... They do not fill the same roles exactly. T-70 is a light Recon tank that uses its main gun that has AOE. Luch is light AI tank that uses "small arm" fire. Even if they did fill the exact same role any discrepancy would mean little because they are facing different enemies. Even if they were facing similar enemies it would still not mean much since different faction are designed differently with different strengths and weakness. If you are having trouble countering the luch try getting a Su-76. It's a solid AT unit with a bonus barrage. Once more Penal are OP and blobbing them should not be a path to victory, Luch a a counter to exclusive Penal spam and actually there should be more. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Faction Fuel Balancing25 Oct 2017, 21:55 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Oct 2017, 20:24 PMJae For Jett As to refocus how this reply applies to the greater discussion: I don't think they need an early t3/t70 timing. I don't think soviets need a buff (read: more power added). They need the power that they do have to be redistributed to things other than dshks, penals, and m4cs. Imo it simply that allot of WFA armies units (and Penals) must be toned down. In: COH2 Balance