Profile of Grim

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1096

General Information


Thread: IR Ht5 Aug 2019, 19:12 PM I think units and abilities that require zero micro or even a simple few clicks to utilise need to be changed. The IRHT is a huge pain in team games as for a minimal price it provides a huge and unrelenting information advantage to the axis team. Even if you push and destroy it they can build another one for likely cheaper than the manpower/fuel you lost in destroying it a lot of the time. Counter battery on the Lefh (off topic I know) is a similar issue. Absolutely no micro tax after one click. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG34 idea31 Jul 2019, 09:48 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2019, 09:12 AMMaret Don't forget about powerfull AP rounds to stop enemy LV and shred infantry to pieces. Good point. Obviously I would be happy for the MG42 to get the 'Sustained Fire' ability from the maxim in exchange, to keep the balance In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG34 idea31 Jul 2019, 09:07 AM Jump back to quoted post31 Jul 2019, 08:04 AMullumulu Hello, MG34 is the worst MG in game ... and its bad for its costs. One thing would increase the usage of it: give it a nondoc camouflage (like some Ost commanders have) upgrade. (same cost like ost with commander) // or maybe from vet1/2 So it would have a tricky thing which make it more usefully and we would see it more. Shouldn't the Maxim be getting the camouflage as it's the worst MG in the game? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pak Howitzer needs adjustment28 Jul 2019, 15:32 PM In team games they are good against Ost. Okw's stuka makes most support weapons irrelevant. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: British balance - Tommy too strong28 Jul 2019, 15:30 PM UKF are the weakest faction imo. However, IS are the best mainline infantry WHEN they have bolster and brens. If IS are nerfed then we need to look at the UKF faction as a whole as much of it is being carried by 3-4 decent units while the rest (including emplacements)are just useless. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet B4 "Change"26 Jul 2019, 21:18 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jul 2019, 19:41 PMullumulu Von Ivan didnt lost cause of weak B4. Maybe he lost cause of early m3 and pio lost? Or the fact thats he clumb the b4? Or cause of not able to use his many advantages? Or not focusing the lefh? The real facts are: If something is actually OP you will see it EVERY game (in team games at least). Remember when JLI were OP? Or the Sherman fast firing glitch? Or Windustry/Elite Troops? People have absolutely NO qualms about cheesing/glitching/exploiting an OP unit to secure the win. If the B4 actually helped people win we would see it all the time. Now I know this is the part where you say you see it 'every game' etc so I'm going to preempt that statement: No. You don't. The B4 is an occasional meme but otherwise useless. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?25 Jul 2019, 13:47 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Jul 2019, 08:15 AMDangerous-Cloth Soviet sniper counters tiger This is what happens when you read things out of context. In: Lobby
Thread: Everything with this faction is so friggen expenisve...21 Jul 2019, 15:38 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jul 2019, 14:03 PMStug life u are still spouting bullshit with no stats or invent them ? Like the armor nerf on the WC 51 ? volks lose to rifle at mid and close range and are equal at long range rilfe have much better vet too Mid and Late game rifles are fine so long as they have vet and are pimped out with BARs. It's the early game land grab where a rifleman sqauad and a RearEch go up against a Sturmpio and Volk squad where things can so often go sour. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Everything with this faction is so friggen expenisve...19 Jul 2019, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Jul 2019, 18:11 PMStug life btw thank u all for ignoring my post and not posting any stats or proof on why rifle are bad Finger guns No problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?19 Jul 2019, 09:03 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Jul 2019, 09:01 AMSeductiveCardbordBox MK VII 75mm Accuracy Far: 0.025 Penetration Far: 105 StuG III G Target size: 17 Front Armour: 140 Chance to hit : 0.02517=0.425, ~43%. Not accounting for scattered shots. Chance to pen = 105/140=0.75, 75% chance of a long range pen on an unvetted StuG So not accounting for scattered shots, a 31.875% chance each shot will penetrate a max range StuG. Worse if it is vet 2. A StuG has 560 health, which takes 4 penetrating hits to kill. With each shot having a 31.875% chance to hit and pen, that equates to a rough total of 12.5 shots on average to remove a StuG. StuG 75mm Accuracy Far: 0.04 Penetration Far: 170 MK VII Target Size: 26 Front Armour: 240 Chance to hit: 0.0426=1.04, 100% chance to hit Chance to pen: 170/240=0.7083..., 71% chance to pen A MK VII has 1400hp which takes 9 penetrating hits to kill. Every shot will hit and has a 70% chance to penetrate, that equates to roughly 12.9 shots on average to kill a MK VII. None of the above is accounting for moving accuracy, scattered shots (only applicable to the MK VII or moving StuG), or nay bulletins applied. You can also double some of the stats for the Stug as there should be at least two of them fighting a churchill at that stage at least. In: Lobby