Profile of Waffaru

Avatar Area

Offline Finland
Posts: 56

General Information
Website: http://steamcommunity.com/id/wafflesidonteven
Steam: 76561198019461067
Birthday: 1993-07-15
Residence:

Finland
Nationality:

Finland
Timezone: Europe/Helsinki
Game Name: Waffaru~

Signature

Playercard of Waffaru~

2v2: P	streak: - 1	with BiggerMac
2v2: P	streak: - 3	with El Bèto
2v2: P	streak: - 1	with Born to Coom

Show Latest Posts


Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions11 Jun 2016, 15:57 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 15:47 PMJohnnyB You are exagerating in every way about OKW. As long a we keep repeating that OKW has every neceary tool and have no AT weaknesses without playing more than one-two games in the banace preview mode, we will not understand. And the shitstorm after patch will go live will be even bigger. But have it your way He wasn't exaggerating, he was listing all the tools you have in your OKW kit that you can use. The problem after the patch goes live is thick-skulled players who WON'T want to adapt because "Muh shrecks". Before the patch OKW had really no AT weakness as volks filled this role, and after the patch even less so now that they get non-doctrinal snares, and they STILL get to keep the shrecks. That's plenty of AT for earlygame unless you decide to waste all your ammo on something else, like throwing a million of flame-grenades, or upgrading STGs too early. But then again, that's what choices are all about. TL;DR: You can either adapt to the changes as a player and develop a new metagame, or you can stay in denial. It's your choice, really. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Small balnce change about IR halftrack11 Jun 2016, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 09:22 AMscratchedpaintjob this is a 3v3+ issue, its fine, if not UP in 1v1 and 2v2 Seeing how 3v3's and 4v4's in a week made for almost half the games in 125-250 ranking and 250-500 ranking, and nearly 75% of the played matches in 500+ ranking, this is an issue that cannot just be sweeped under the rug and dismissed. I used http://coh2chart.com/ as my source. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Small balnce change about IR halftrack11 Jun 2016, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2016, 08:54 AMShanka It's not the aim of this topic I just want to see a solid change to this unit for now But for ost you get the sniper and the mighty 222 UKF you get the sniper,tommies enhanced LOS (small but something) command vehicule FREE recon, flare on the arty doc and some other doc recon USF you get m20, pathfinders, rifleman with the recon doc (not sure about doc name) major recon and vetted stuart He DID ask what the non-doctrinal ways of recon are. (Designate command vehicle is doctrinal, Airlanding officer is doctrinal) and so is most of what you suggested USF uses as recon. Plus most of your suggestions are worse than having a free wallhack behind a wall of fire, as you have to move the unit close enough to have LoS. As for what should be done to the IR Half-track, I agree that it either should be moved as a doctrinal unit, or increase it's cost and make the recon an active ability with cooldown, with the addition of ít not piercing buildings and other objects that might block infrared-rays. Attached is a picture of the effect of infrared on structures. As you can see, it does not penetrate buildings (Which is to say, you cannot see anything behind the building. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: I don't get why Brits are still receiving buffs7 Jun 2016, 16:17 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2016, 00:51 AM__deleted__ 2v2s are shit right now because of land mattress, volk blobs, calli, and emplacement cancer bullshit, oh also free rapid firing counter barrage, combined with shit maps like crossing in the woods, semosiky, and other shit 2v2 maps. Honestly if they just remove brace or remove bofors 2v2s or the game in general would be much better. Lelic pls remove game for balance thx In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW (balance preview mode) - concerns and solutions6 Jun 2016, 11:27 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2016, 21:06 PMFiresparks the Okw's anti-tank capability problem is entirely related to the medical truck and mech truck dilemma. The Puma can counter any allied light while the luch can handle allied vehicle with support. The main problem with going mech is that you're skipping healing. the problem with going medical truck is that you're fairly weak against the early vehicle. the only thing remotely close to being an AT vehicle in the med truck is the flak ht, and that thing is crap. then the obivous solution is to buff the flak ht. This promote combined arms and bypass the issue with schreck and raketen. Ost already prove that you need a vehicle of your own to counter vehicle. Don't try to buff the rak or the sturm schreck. You don't see the problem with your "obvious solutions"? You're not supposed to have all the answers to your problems on a single building. If you want to be able to fight early vehicles better, you go for the mech building in lieu of having a retreat point closer to the area of operations for better map presence and more aggressive infantry play. Or do you think other players have it all ready in a single building? You have to be able to feel and predict what your enemies are going to be relying on earlygame. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Calliope OP?6 Jun 2016, 11:04 AM You don't happen to be one of the axis players I 2v2'd against with my friend on Trois Ponts? We were using 2 Calliopes and 2 Land mattressess after securing the perimeter around the inner island. One of them was crying at us for "spamming op things" and for maphack, after I scouted the OKW's retreat point and barraged it after a retreat. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When this May patch goes live?4 Jun 2016, 10:37 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Jun 2016, 07:14 AMDiogenes5 The player base is about to get reamed bigtime. They are about to abandon COH2 for DOW3 and COH2 is going to be in an even worst state than at launch. citation needed In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Petition to revert crushing change22 May 2016, 20:17 PM Voted yes, this is just another change to accomodate the low-tier axis players (and even then, mostly OKW) that like to bundle their units together. There's really no other reason for this to be removed. Axis has capable crushing ability too, specially with blitzkrieg. And with the upcoming snare addition to the OKW, it's going to become more of a situational tactic rather than an obvious one for allies players facing blobs. A smart player would not have problem dealing with the threat of a incoming tank crush. Players should adapt and learn to counter enemy tactics, instead of having to ruin it for everyone by removing and limiting core mechanics. And realistically, aside from the crushing (a mechanic that the axis also can put into play) capabilities of allies' medium tanks, they have no non-doctrinal way to punish blobbing enemies, apart from SU's Katyushas. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors3 May 2016, 00:53 AM Jump back to quoted post2 May 2016, 21:50 PMIntelligence209 The only counter is when relic gets their quota and nerfs it. Go ahead, keep letting the cancer spread.. Fact of the matter is. It's push button for one player. Extream micro for another. Forces OH commander choice Forces OKW to Yolo blobb and hope it's not supported by an ally, or Mgs and such JUST ANOTHER ELIMENT IN THE GAME WHERE AXIS ARE RESPONDING TO ALLIED GAME PLAY -somethING that has been a problem since the release of the game There are 3 people who are on these fourms constantly watching for threads like this, and to defend emplacements to death. Remove emplacements period Wow, your posts sure don't live up to your name. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: These OKW HQ nerfs are over the top25 Apr 2016, 10:59 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Apr 2016, 08:21 AMRiCE So when will relic remove the free bazookas for USF teching? Reading the changelog before commenting on a thread about the new balance the changelog is making is generally a good idea. In: COH2 Balance