Profile of _GarbageMan_

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 83

General Information


Thread: ISG counters?2 Nov 2015, 18:55 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2015, 21:15 PMCoventrierer to counter the, already nerfed, ISG's. HAHAHAHA "Nerfed" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove ML-20 from the game 2 Nov 2015, 18:54 PM I think it should have a brace function just like the British personally. That way you have a chance to save the weapon from a CAS player. Let it kill the crew, but for god sakes whats the point of a ML-20 when CAS is a instant counter? Or eh just get rid of CAS and make the entire community happy. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How can the t34 become a part of the meta?30 Oct 2015, 17:42 PM I agree with above. IF they don't buff it, at least make it a Tier 3 again where it belongs at it's current performance. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Flame Hetzer Blows30 Oct 2015, 16:18 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 09:47 AMWeißAlchimist Are you sure? It doesn't seem unintended. At least to me from patch notes. They pretty much wanted to make flames do the same dmg across the board. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Coh2 post patch performance30 Oct 2015, 15:27 PM I play 3 vs 3 a lot. Typically top 100 team. We have been crashing (all of us) a lot since the latest patch. To say the least we're not in the top 100 anymore because of crashes. I honestly don't own a game that crashes as much as COH2. And I own a lot of alpha greenlight games. In: Lobby
Thread: Flame Hetzer Blows30 Oct 2015, 15:24 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2015, 05:04 AMwafive even the kv8 pop cap is 14, why the light turretless is 16 ? lol lelic It comes out sooner than a kv8 to be fair... You axis are the ones that cried all the rivers to nerf flames...well there you have it. Now you have a shitty expensive tank just like all the rest of us and our KV8's. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How can the t34 become a part of the meta?30 Oct 2015, 15:23 PM Yeh I just don't understand why a tank that requires 2 (with good micro) or 3 with sub-par micro to kill a single P4 is 300 manpower. One okw schreck volley takes it down to close to half health...wouldn't be so bad if schrecks didn't have pin point accuracy even at the edge of fog of war. The Russian engineers take ages to repair anything. the t34/76 is just not worth it...which is funny because there were so many of them built as an army. The gas cost is good, no need to change it. I think they need to make the t34-76 just a t34-85 for it's current cost or lower it to at least 270-280 manpower. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How can the t34 become a part of the meta?30 Oct 2015, 01:40 AM They need to be cheaper and actually pen. They honestly should be more like a t34 85. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: KV8 - Patch Notes16 Oct 2015, 21:15 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Oct 2015, 18:33 PMFrost You sir, just confirmed that you are incapable of reading. Everyone coming to this thread without reading and with crying "serious it's OP" lol?? I'm NOT crying saying the nerf is not warranted. I GET IT. The devs want to make more consistent damage with the flames, again I get it. That is NOT the point of this thread. The only thing I'm arguing, and the point of the original post, and as kelton posted just above is that to counter the COST of the unit per it's new founded damage rates, they need to either make it slightly cheaper, or in my opinion make the main toggle tank gun better vs armor to give it a dual purpose with more reasonable micro. Otherwise it's going to be another unit to never be used again in my opinion. Because even right now it's typically a hard decision to build the KV8 vs two regular Russian tanks for the cost even. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KV8 - Patch Notes16 Oct 2015, 18:23 PM In the latest patch preview they mention they are nerfing the KV8 by A LOT: Churchill Crocodile Flamethrower damage reduced from 12 to 10 KV-8 damage reduced from 16 to 10 Universal Carrier Wasp damage increased from 6 to 10 The problem with the KV-8 is that it's pretty weak compared to the croc. The croc also is able to shoot a formidable gun. The KV-8 main gun that can be toggled is complete garbage. It MIGHT be able to kill a kube, even that I doubt. The churchhill has lots of armor, flames and a good gun, it's weakness is price. The UC is very cheap compared to the others, it's weakness is armor. The KV8's one redeeming quality is it's flames...now that it's subpar...what will be the point at it's price? With the recent nerf, they are not changing the man power cost either to counter the nerf. It's pretty much will absolutely not be worth the cost now in my opinion. It's very slow/clumsy/ and pathing it terrible for it. It's very easily countered by mines, faust, tanks, pretty anything. It can kill lone AT crews, but anything combined kills it. I'm not saying it bad right now...it does kill really good against infantry, I just don't think it will be worth the cost after the nerf. In my opinion, in order to make it worth still getting after the flame nerf, they should give the main (non-flame) gun better damage to make it somewhat worth it to call in. Right now it's basically like throwing a stone at a tank with it. I'm all for adding micro to a unit to maintain balance, in order to at least give a unit a purpose. In: COH2 Balance