Profile of adamírcz

sry, but i dont think this is a grammatically correct english sentence
atleast i dont get what you mean

Apology accepted, but I think it is

Just google ´seeking forgiveness´

1) Big no to further homogenizations

2) It would be a nerf, the way it is now helps REs to make it to that precious vet2

3) The less reasons to go 4 IS build and more to go for combined arms players get, the better

So yeah, to sum up, I voted to break your nose

Some of these have really BS formating:

Do you think soviets should have six man crews or 4 men? Options: Yes or No

Also putting two questions at once.

For example:

I do think T34 performs godlike against inf at vet0 yes, but not that it needs nerf since it has minimum AT power

Compare it with Ostwind and it wont seem too OP

As for Soviet weapons, definitely 6 men, even more homogenizations would be absolutely disasterous for the game

But a nice poll otherwise

Nice ideas
Very nice

Some of mine:

Larger factions with more core units,(say instead of aprox 15 Muricans and 15 Brit units, we just had faction called Western Allies, facin off against combo of Africa Corps and Italians, etc.) It seems like that would make balancing even harder, but it would also create a lot more variety and increase a chance that every strat finds it simple counter eventually

Every army should have enough core abilities to find a counter to any opposing stuff either doc or non-doc. There should be a list of basic unit types that every army gets by default (Damage sponge, recon specialist, cheap accesible anti-MG unit, mobile indirect, cheap garrison denial, etc)
Assymetry should be in forms which these units take (Handheld flamer vs flamer vehicle, vs anti-concrete ammunition; Rocket arty vs howi; etc) and ofc stats
Commanders should include more niche, out of the box stuff (The radio intercepts, abilities to type to enemy team chat, global sprint, heavier bombing runs, etc)

Things like abbandon, weapon drops, main gun crits, plane crashes, etc should be reworked into happening under specific circumstances, not pure RNG

Map variety and map balance. Do not dominate the poll with one type of design. CoH2 is 95+% long narrow laney maps and stuff with long sightlines and support weapons/ long range units dominance. Its ok to have some, but there need to also be enough of wide short ones, etc, CoH1 was a lot better at variety, and that had just 6 2vs2 automatch maps

Fix the damn AI. At the very least some basic stuff such as "Sees three hardcounters to unit X = does not build unit X" or "X minute mark has passed = does not fucking build kubel"

Cosmetic customization. Skins for infantry as well as vehicles

Ingame unit wikipedia with info tied directly to files with stats

Ingame map editor with simplicity levels of commands in cheat mod

Replays that work properly, not some BS that dont allow rewind and breaks after patch

If there would be Soviets: Gary Oldman as their announcer

Player controllable unit formations - could pick from several preset ones or set up their own

Wrong