Profile of Nabarxos

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 392

General Information


Thread: Overall Balance23 Sep 2015, 04:53 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2015, 04:40 AMMr. Someguy When Panzer IV's are on-par with T-34/76 and Shermans stack up to Panthers, you can consider Ost T4 equivalent to USF T3. Panzer 4s are on-par with shermans not t-34/76s the T34/76 is awful at the moment and its only purpuse is to ram an enemy tank at key moment In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Air Supremacy is just completely OP 22 Sep 2015, 14:50 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 14:28 PMBudwise And an Emplacement that you can rebuild instantly if you wanted is not equal to a tech building that can't be replaced for several minutes if you can afford it at all. sorry but you forget that 1)British emplacements cost alot more then OKW trucks 2)British dont flow MP 3)Emplacements have pop cap so you have a smaller army then the enemy(unlike OKW trucks) 4)British emplacements get 2 shotted by mortar halftrucks 5)British emplacements are not as durable as OKW trucks In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Air Supremacy is just completely OP 22 Sep 2015, 14:46 PM so a 325Munitions ability that has a delay and comes at 12cp is wiping your static positions late game NO KIDDING why should the trucks even survive this??? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2 Solutions for JP4 Camo (serious thread, not trolling)21 Sep 2015, 08:27 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2015, 07:28 AMIron Emperor The problem that I have with the current state of the churchill is as followed: Yesterday I had a 4v4 game with some friends of mine and I've put 2 Pak 43 guns + 3 Rakettenwerfers up to deal with the constant flow of 3 churchills. Luckely there were no crocodile or AVRE chruchills to deal with. My Pak 43 were hitting the churchill all the time since it has insane penetration, but even while they were hitting them fully they just returned with a slimmer of health after approximatly 5-6 shots (don't know the exact amount). After a while I got 3 rakettenwerfers to help to seal the deal, but 8 of the 10 shots fired just bounced. I'm completely familiar with the RNGezus but in my opinion the Churchill currently has a HP pool that's way too big (get it to 1280 for max) and has for his HP pool too much armour. It's like the same with the JagdTiger. While it has 1280 HP it does have around 400-525 armour (don't know the exact amount of this). While you can have multiple churchills it's just extremely hard to deal with it at some point. Don't get me wrong, because I think it's fine that they'll have good tanks, but not unbeatable godtanks (same as the JT on long narrow maps). The only tank I do concider OP next to the churchills are Centaurs, even while you can beat them quite nicely by good AT usage. I hope that this will clearify it a bit for you i understand the problem you had during that game now according to the forums the churchill has(tech one) 1600HP 270-280 Armor its as slow or slower then a king tiger has a gun like the kv-1s or/and a little better its an anvill unit(so you dont get it if you choose hammer) it costs 540Mp and 150Fuel now i also have to say that the comet and the is-2/isu-152 have better armor then the churchill atm before i go on now the churchill if it bounces 3 raketenwefer at shots is just RNG (it may even happen on comets and is-2s) so you cant base much balance to it as for the pak43s hitting the churchill and Penetrating BUT not killing it but leaving it heavily damaged is not broken either,infact it would be a better choice to bring a jagdpanzer 4/panther to finish of the churchills instead of at guns the same thing happens with the USF against panthers and tigers,they have too much armor,HP and they escape with "smoke" its the same thing with churchills also i dont see them as god tanks in any way(still havent seen a churchill beat tigers/panthers/jagdpanzer 4s) the only thing i would suggest is a price increase(more fuel to like 200) but then again i dont see how its possible to spam them without having support still if an HP redution is needed then we should decrease the price of it or otherwise the comet will be the only viable option late game i should also point out that during the alpha the churchill was the most overpriced shitty unit you could field(losing to 1 pak,panzer 4 or even stugs for the matter)cause it didnt took damage like it was supposed to and it was VERY SLOW and most people went for a comet so bear that in mind In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2 Solutions for JP4 Camo (serious thread, not trolling)21 Sep 2015, 06:26 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2015, 06:24 AMIron Emperor Ok I'll specify my reaction. Fix those churchill tanks then talk about a JP4 could you explain to me the problem with the churchill tanks?? apart from the croc the churchill are fine to me In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2 Solutions for JP4 Camo (serious thread, not trolling)21 Sep 2015, 06:18 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2015, 22:32 PMIron Emperor First fix Brits tanks then fix axis tanks. Currently the brit tanks are way out of their league... wtf is this??? should we wait 5 years to fix a broken ability????? and whats so broken about British tanks other then being good and viable??? if buggs exist then point them like the centaur one BUT ignoring that broken ability is just...... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 2 Solutions for JP4 Camo (serious thread, not trolling)20 Sep 2015, 20:29 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2015, 05:33 AMAlexzandvar How about instead of accusing me of fanboyism actually engage my argument? I would never say the Vickers bug is okay and accusing me of defending it is fucking shitty as hell. What is you problem dude? The SU-85 doesn't cost as much, has better maneuverability and a traversal gun, and the ability to self sight. It's scary good with vet (although tracking sucks). The JPIV does have a cool down on it's recloak on toggling it? No and I guess that's a problem. Literally from the game files; it can't cloak if it's been in combat in 5 seconds. Button doesn't keep it in combat which might be an issue as well, but if you have something hit or shoot at it then unless it's not hit for 5 seconds it can't cloak. you are defending a broken ability,he pointed out WHY its broken and you just told him to L2P..... he explained his strategy to you and you IGNORED IT like a true AXIS FANBOY,he used 3 expandable tanks to take out a VET 4 JAGDPANZER 4,but that didnt worked cause the tank disapeared at point blank range facing 3 medium tanks,he flanked the Jagdpanzer 4 and it was facing its rear armor and then suddly the tank disapeared...... if you could atleast understand the problem then MAYBE he and i wouldnt name you an axis fanboy In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 17th Sept Patch impressions - post here20 Sep 2015, 11:26 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2015, 11:17 AMJohnnyB Man, before patch emplacements were like interdiction zones for every early to middle game axis unit. Now the only difference is that they were balanced. So they don't feel OP anymore, they feel BALANCED. And if you want to say anything, I will just tell you to look at OKW emplacements and tell me that they are ok so I can say that you are more than biased. care to explain why they were before OP and now balanced??? In: Lobby
Thread: JagdTiger and Elephant need counters19 Sep 2015, 21:39 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2015, 21:06 PMThatRabidPotato waaa waaa a super heavy super expensive unit with ONE JOB does its ONE JOB effectively waa waaaaaaaaa There's so many ways to deal with them. You are literally complaining that THE ONE THING IT IS DESIGNED TO STOP, IS STOPPED BY IT. Here's a hint, it's called a AT GUN WALL. Or, KILL ITS SUPPORT FIRST. All the Allied factions have artillery and infantry based tools for killing infantry and team weapons. Kill those first, then move in. Stop thinking so linearly. If you can't kill it because it's supported, don't beat your head on a wall. If you do that, the Axis player has outplayed you and deserves to win. you missed the point of the thread both units dont have counters and the only "ones" we have atm is called flanking with tanks which is countered by both tanks so we face a problem of countering those vehicles In: COH2 Balance
Thread: JagdTiger and Elephant need counters19 Sep 2015, 21:33 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2015, 20:17 PMThatRabidPotato And these things called ZiS guns, don't forget those. A group of three will either kill it or force it to hide in it's base. Same for the JT. You can easily win a slugfest against these things. Step 1. Get machine guns. Step 2. Get infantry. Step 3. Kill supporting infantry. Step 4. Get AT guns. Step 5. Shove Axis player off star. Step 6. Swarm with 2 or 3 mediums. Step 7. Win game. That's how you deal with a supported one. These things are supposed to be the linchpin of an AT defense. If it is properly supported, then the Axis player SHOULD WIN, because he has outplayed you, kept his units alive, and has a cohesive defense around the stars that he has asserted dominance over. IT IS THEIR ENTIRE PURPOSE IN THE GAME TO SHUT DOWN MASSED ARMOR PLAY BY THE OTHER TEAM. Nerf their armor, and the other team can just bumrush it with tanks, trade 1 for 1, and the unit is utterly useless. One that's not supported is even easier to kill. Step 1. Swarm with 2 or 3 mediums. lets see the penetration chance of the Zis-3 and the 57mmAt gun against both the elefant and the Jagdtiger Zis-3 Penetration chance against an Elefant 50%/47%/45% Chance of penetration of frotnal armor Conclusion,the Zis -3 is unreliable at countering the elefant duo to unreliable penetration (remember only close/point black range has 50% at penetrating the frontal armor of the elefant) Zis-3 Penetration Chance Against a Jagtiger 36%/34%/32% Chance of Penetration of frontal armor Conclusion,the Zis-3 cant in any way penetrate reliably penetrate and threaten the jagdtiger 57mm AT-GUN Chance of penetration against an Elefant 35%/31%/28% Chance of penetration of frontal armor Conclusion,the 57mm at gun is awful at fighting the elefant and cant in any way pose a threat to the elefant 57mm AT-gun Chance of penetration aagainst a Jagdtiger 25%/22%/20% Chance of penetration of frontal armor Conclusion,the American AT GUN is terrible against a jagdtiger and should never be used as a way to counter the Jagdtiger cause its a waste of resources remember that both AT guns will never face the rear armor of both Tank destroyers so adding rear armor penetration values would be a waste,also the american at gun cant in any way penetrate both tanks and AP rounds wont help much to change it. so AT gun walls dont work and is a waste of resources AT handhelds have even lower penetration chances then both at guns and do less damage then 100 damage(80 damage)so even if your lucky and penetrate tanks with alot of at handhelds you wont do enough damage to destroy it or even threaten them cause of High HP values In: COH2 Balance