Profile of JibberJabberJobber

Jump back to quoted post3 Jul 2019, 20:55 PMSander93

It gives -20% damage reduction to anything around it. That means all your tanks and vehicles can take one extra shot and Brummbars and Panthers (and Elefant) can take two extra (160 dmg) shots. That's huge. Infantry and support weapons are more durable too, especially versus indirect fire.

Jump back to quoted post2 Jul 2019, 22:15 PMClarity

Honestly I would probably just remove the Battlephase 2 requirement and let Ostheer have a Puma within Tier 2, maybe increase it's cost a bit to compensate I feel like 80 would be fine. I think the old call-in Ostheer Puma was that cost. Right now it takes OKW about 130 fuel to obtain a Puma, with these changes the Ostheer Puma would require about 140-150 fuel which I think would be reasonable. If the doctrine becomes too powerful finally tying the Command Tank call-in to Tier 3 I think would be a good nerf just to prevent people from Puma spamming into Command Tank call-in. I feel Ostheer is the faction that could really use the Puma as I feel they struggle harder against light vehicles than OKW does. Usually OKW can at least get a Panzer II to tank damage for the Rak's whereas the Ostheer light vehicles aren't able to efficiently defend the Pak unless you build multiple of them which delays Tier 3.

Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2019, 09:48 AMmrgame2

Perhaps to give grens longer range and pgren slightly faster movement to compensate?

Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2019, 15:04 PMmrgame2

Just curious, as a Wehr 2v2 player, my grens have trouble wiping their weapon teams and retreating infantry.

On the other hand, i experience Penals,Rifles and BrensIS, wipe my retreating units far easier.

This cause me to suspect the target size? Or the more firing mens?

Feels frustrating as Wehr player, you need to retreat off map faster than Allies.