as for ratings on metacritic: it's called something like "crowd intelligence"... given enough reviews, the rating should be accurate.
This is not considered wisdom of the crowd, as it deals with a subjective, rather than objective, question. There is no overall correct answer to the question: how do you rate CoH2? |
Ah, great. Now I can finally watch HelpingHans versus VonIvan on their respective streams at the same time.
I think most people already use http://www.multitwitch.tv/ though. |
Rogers. If you "dont give a fuck" then why do you bother to write your own review on that "random" website?
|
Depending on your country of residence I give you an A/100%/10. |
That's fine, you bumped it.
I dont think posting within 24 hours of the last post is considered bumping, is it..? |
Japan's current fiscal year ends march 2014, so a few months after that you will know the exact sales of CoH2. |
I think it's pretty awesome that they post at all and give insights into what they were thinking with different concepts and units. I dont think the metaphors are meant to be insulting, that said, I invite you to read many of the responses and statements on the boards for inspiration as to why what you suggest might be true.
We know what they are thinking, because it is in the actual game. We dont really want them to respond in this manor on these forums, because their comments are all very general and quite hollow. However, this is understandable given their responsibilities towards Relic. Instead, we want them to respond with patches. |
Are PE/Brits even in the game?
As far as I know there are 3 allied camps and 2 axis which means an axis player has to prepare for a total of 3 match-ups whereas an allied player only prepares for 2... In a highly competitive scene, that is a bit rubbish (in my opinion).
I cannot believe this to be a serious post given the date of posting. |
Hei,
i honestly think, that the metacritic score seems kinda weird. many people giving it 0/10, because they are Russians and ignorant and dont like their history, many famous community guys giving it 10/10 (rogers, Hans, Markus, avderoos). cmon guys, coh2 is neither 0 nor 10 points, and we as intermediates to pros should know that. Krebs was at least honest not giving it 10 points.
what are your opinions on that?
Robustness checks need to be applied to adjust for these type of outliers and atleast remove the 0 and 10 ratings. Apart from the statistical meaning of these extreme ratings, the people that give these ratings do not properly explain their valuation reasoning for the game. My estimate is that the 5.8 is fairly close to the actual rating of the crowd. |
Cool thing is that if he uses sniper in the M3 then there is a 50% chance for each member to die when M3 is destroyed. Thus there is 25% chance that both die when M3 explodes. There is also a 75% chance that one of the two snipers will die, thus making it easy to chase down the remaining member with the german 222(or whatever unit) you killed it with.
Interesting math...if you say the chance of both dieing is 25% and either one of them dieing is 75%, then what happened to the chance none of them dies..?
Indeed, the chance either one of them dies is 50%, the chance they both die is 25% and the the chance none of them die is 25%. |