Profile of Latch

It was on Lienne forest so I guess that explains it, what is it with that map affects units?

yeah but only the VP is a cutoff


which is what i have said, you only have to defend the VP to gain resources. Easier than defending two cutoffs at once

The point in front of the VP is also a cut off, you have to hold both

I'm mostly playing 3v3's and I've noticed that most of the maps I hate playing have really stupid cut off locations that work in theory but in practice just make the game less fun to play.

By far the worst contender for this is hill 400, and to add insult to injury they're on red cover...

Whiteball Express has this "feature" too where cutoffs are placed JUST behind the front lines, and to make matters worse with that map, the cutoff LOS/Shot blockers are positioned so the defender has a narrow passage through, where the attacker has a huge viewpoint on the position. I like this map when I'm not playing a game were I constantly defend/attack the cut off.

A cut off should be high risk high reward, it should be near enough outside the enemy base, take Crossroads, and Langress as the main examples that come to mind with a cut off positioned in a risky spot for the attacker.

The majority of 3v3 maps that I can think of counter this by having 2 points needed to be cut off before the enemy is denies all resources, and while not ideal, its better than having a cut off easily accessible but it ideally should be always located in a position that is risky but not out of reach and when it is taken, it should be easier for the defender to take it back than it is for the attacker to hold.

/Rant

Follow your own advice "Stop with the strawman, do something with your comprehension." since I never said that according to your opinion "2 mediums should be superior to 1 heavy tank."

"I literally said:"

"If building 2 mediums was always a better choice no one would bother to use a commander to get a heavy tank. It is a simply as that. "

Now do you actually have any stats that indicate that Tiger/IS-2/Peshing/Croc/Tigers OKW are chosen more often in 4vs4 than in 1vs1?

I'd argue 100% of team games you will get at least 1 heavy tank compared to 1v1's just based alone on the probability of 8 players vs 2 so that's a bit of a moot point...

Losing to brainless tactics because of bad team.

Last game I completely dominated my flank but the SOV player decided to spam 120mm. My teammate should have taken care of it right?

Nop. He decided to bunker down near the point (he didn't even try to cap) and called it a day. Meanwhile my squads get absolutely raped by 4 120mm squads.

And he was top 500 player...

90% of your moaning is about team games, either don't play them, play fixed games or learn that not everyone can be as pro as you at this game.