Profile of bicho1

Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2015, 22:53 PMassbag

Now that relic apparently reads thease forums I'd like to resurrect this old topic; inefficiency of panthers. Not only are they very expensive to tech and the units themselves are expensive. With the recent pop cap reduction for heavies they also became pop inefficent units too. Why would you take 16 pop panther over 19 pop tiger? Or compare it to 16 pop pershing which has similiar at capabilities and is also godly against infantry

Ostheer T3 on the other hand has more efficent units despite being cheaper. Only 80 fuel stug which only takes 8 pop (probably too efficent since Pak takes 9). I'd take two stugs over one panther anyday.

Panthers imo should get pop reduction to 14 like jacksons and fireflys and get a slight price decrease or give them a dual purpose gun.

Jump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 22:01 PMVuther

The AP rounds already cost 30. Which is still too high, on that note. I'd just say simply reducing the cost to 20 to start with, maybe even 15 if that's necessary. Literally the only problem with the 57mm is the guaranteed muni bleed to make it function a lot of the time.

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 12:14 PM__deleted__

Vet 3 cons are monsters.

Jump back to quoted post22 Nov 2015, 10:40 AMIIGuderian

Im sorry but im afraid this is a l2p issue